NRGD vs. NTSD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NRGD is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.

Performance

NRGD vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NRGD

• 1D: -5.59%
• 1M: -6.21%
• YTD: -70.71%
• 6M: -67.28%
• 1Y: -80.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSD

• 1D: -1.11%
• 1M: 7.13%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGD vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-17.07%
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	17.91%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and NTSD is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026	0.62

Return for Risk

NRGD vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGD

NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGD vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NRGD	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.09	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.47	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NRGD	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.81	5.08	-5.89

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.64%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and NTSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGD	NTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.64%	-5.20%	-84.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.24%	-1.11%	-88.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.88%	-0.84%	-58.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.87%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NRGD	NTSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.52%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.26%	24.28%	+49.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.83%	24.28%	+64.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.83%	24.28%	+64.55%

NRGD vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRGD vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRGD nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGD and NTSD in my portfolio?

NRGD and NTSD have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NRGD or NTSD?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGD or NTSD?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGD or NTSD?

NRGD and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NRGD and NTSD?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.35% for NTSD.