NRGD vs. MVLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - NRGD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NRGD returned -80.85% vs 1215.17% for MVLL. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for MVLL.

Performance

NRGD vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -70.71% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 842.68% return.

NRGD

• 1D: -5.59%
• 1M: -6.21%
• YTD: -70.71%
• 6M: -67.28%
• 1Y: -80.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MVLL

• 1D: 7.14%
• 1M: 201.84%
• YTD: 842.68%
• 6M: 558.01%
• 1Y: 1,215.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGD vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-70.71%	-45.06%
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF	842.68%	-10.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and MVLL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025	-0.14

NRGD vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRGD	MVLL
Energy	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	66.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

NRGD vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGD

NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

MVLL

MVLL Risk / Return Rank: 96
MVLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MVLL Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MVLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MVLL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGD vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NRGD	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.09	9.23	-10.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.47	4.79	-7.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.63	-0.89
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	25.11	-26.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.53	52.27	-53.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NRGD vs. MVLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGD Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the MVLL Sharpe Ratio of 9.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGD and MVLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NRGD	MVLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.09	9.23	-10.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.81	3.33	-4.14

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.64%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and MVLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGD	MVLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.64%	-59.02%	-30.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.88%	-48.93%	-33.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.24%	0.00%	-89.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.88%	-22.42%	-36.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	52.87%	23.46%	+29.41%

Volatility

NRGD vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) is 29.27%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 60.78%. This indicates that NRGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRGD	MVLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.27%	60.78%	-31.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	58.52%	96.08%	-37.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.26%	133.11%	-58.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.83%	139.63%	-50.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.83%	139.63%	-50.80%

NRGD vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MVLL's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRGD vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRGD nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGD and MVLL in my portfolio?

NRGD and MVLL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NRGD or MVLL?

MVLL has higher volatility (60.78%) compared to NRGD (29.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGD dropped -89.64% vs MVLL's -59.02%.

Which ETF is better, NRGD or MVLL?

On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 1215.17% vs -80.85% for NRGD. On fees, NRGD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGD has been the lower-risk option at 29.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NRGD or MVLL?

Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 1215.17% return vs -80.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGD or MVLL?

NRGD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MVLL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGD or MVLL?

NRGD and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NRGD and MVLL?

NRGD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). They also come from different issuers: BMO and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 1.50% for MVLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.23 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.