NRGD vs. BEG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NRGD is passively managed, while BEG is actively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NRGD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.

Performance

NRGD vs. BEG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGD achieves a -63.27% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 658.88% return.

NRGD

• 1D: -2.47%
• 1M: 16.95%
• YTD: -63.27%
• 6M: -63.90%
• 1Y: -72.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BEG

• 1D: -13.66%
• 1M: 4.00%
• YTD: 658.88%
• 6M: 577.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRGD vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-63.27%	4.91%
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF	658.88%	1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGD and BEG is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

NRGD vs. BEG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGD

NRGD Risk / Return Rank: 1
NRGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Omega Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NRGD Martin Ratio Rank: 1

BEG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRGD vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRGD	BEG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.97	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.82	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.90	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.45	—	—

Drawdowns

NRGD vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGD drawdown since its inception was -89.64%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGD and BEG.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGD	BEG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.64%	-59.85%	-29.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-80.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.51%	-13.66%	-72.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.82%	-16.74%	-43.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NRGD	BEG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.20%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	75.34%	212.91%	-137.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.73%	212.91%	-124.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.73%	212.91%	-124.18%

NRGD vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NRGD vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRGD nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGD and BEG in my portfolio?

NRGD and BEG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NRGD or BEG?

On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGD or BEG?

BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NRGD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGD or BEG?

NRGD and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NRGD and BEG?

They also come from different issuers: BMO and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGD and 0.75% for BEG.