PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRFYX vs. QREARX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRFYX achieves a 7.15% return, which is significantly higher than QREARX's 0.97% return.


NRFYX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
7.15%
6M
7.17%
1Y
10.27%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
4.02%

QREARX

1D
0.01%
1M
0.14%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.10%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRFYX and QREARX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRFYX vs. QREARX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRFYX
NRFYX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
NRFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
NRFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

QREARX
QREARX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QREARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QREARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QREARX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QREARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QREARX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NRFYXQREARXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

2.49

-1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

8.92

-7.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

32.50

-27.88

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRFYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the QREARX Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRFYX and QREARX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NRFYXQREARXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

4.27

-3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

2.13

-1.80

Drawdowns

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRFYX drawdown since its inception was -73.64%, which is greater than QREARX's maximum drawdown of -1.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRFYX and QREARX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRFYXQREARXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.64%

-1.45%

-72.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.10%

-0.37%

-9.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.78%

-0.04%

-3.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.47%

-0.06%

-12.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

0.10%

+2.78%

Volatility

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) at 0.12%. This indicates that NRFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QREARX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRFYXQREARXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

0.12%

+3.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.63%

0.45%

+9.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

0.77%

+12.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

1.66%

+15.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.38%

1.66%

+16.72%

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NRFYX and QREARX have an expense ratio of 0.90%.


Dividends

NRFYX vs. QREARX - Dividend Comparison

NRFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%, while QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NRFYX
Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund
3.03%2.24%4.51%2.66%3.05%5.98%3.81%17.61%10.05%10.64%11.02%9.66%
QREARX
TIAA Real Estate Account
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRFYX and QREARX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NRFYX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to QREARX (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRFYX dropped -73.64% vs QREARX's -1.45%.

QREARX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRFYX and QREARX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer