NRFYX vs. LSIIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX).
NRFYX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Aug 30, 2000. LSIIX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Dec 31, 1996.
Performance
NRFYX vs. LSIIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NRFYX vs. LSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRFYX Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund | -0.18% | 7.51% | 1.47% | 13.42% | -25.75% | 28.33% | -5.50% | 24.32% | -4.52% | 3.78% |
LSIIX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y | -1.33% | 5.58% | 2.91% | 7.50% | -11.31% | 0.18% | 11.60% | 9.04% | -0.31% | 6.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NRFYX achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than LSIIX's -1.33% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NRFYX having a 3.27% annualized return and LSIIX not far behind at 3.12%.
NRFYX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -9.77%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- 6.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.62%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 3.27%
LSIIX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.93%
- 1Y
- 1.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.71%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NRFYX vs. LSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NRFYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIIX's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NRFYX vs. LSIIX — Risk / Return Rank
NRFYX
LSIIX
NRFYX vs. LSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NRFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 0.80 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.33 | -0.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.45 | 4.39 | -2.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NRFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.16 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.71 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 1.14 | -0.82 |
Correlation
The correlation between NRFYX and LSIIX is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
NRFYX vs. LSIIX - Dividend Comparison
NRFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than LSIIX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRFYX Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund | 3.26% | 2.24% | 4.51% | 2.66% | 3.05% | 5.98% | 3.81% | 17.61% | 10.05% | 10.64% | 11.02% | 9.66% |
LSIIX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y | 2.97% | 3.68% | 4.86% | 4.25% | 3.32% | 4.10% | 8.20% | 3.56% | 2.18% | 4.10% | 6.71% | 3.91% |
Drawdowns
NRFYX vs. LSIIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NRFYX drawdown since its inception was -73.64%, which is greater than LSIIX's maximum drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRFYX and LSIIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NRFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.64% | -20.77% | -52.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.01% | -3.23% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.95% | -15.62% | -18.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.31% | -15.62% | -24.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.77% | -2.89% | -6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.54% | -2.42% | -10.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.42% | 0.98% | +2.44% |
Volatility
NRFYX vs. LSIIX - Volatility Comparison
Natixis Funds Trust IV AEW Global Focused Real Estate Fund (NRFYX) has a higher volatility of 4.46% compared to Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Y (LSIIX) at 1.36%. This indicates that NRFYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NRFYX | LSIIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 1.36% | +3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 2.75% | +6.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.56% | 4.75% | +11.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 5.23% | +12.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 4.51% | +13.87% |