PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQVRX vs. SMVTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX) and Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with NQVRX having a 16.81% return and SMVTX slightly lower at 16.53%. Over the past 10 years, NQVRX has outperformed SMVTX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while SMVTX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


NQVRX

1D
1.25%
1M
0.34%
6M
11.78%
YTD
16.81%
1Y
29.50%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*
13.28%
ALL TIME*
8.58%

SMVTX

1D
1.19%
1M
-3.94%
6M
8.69%
YTD
16.53%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
19.22%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
11.55%
ALL TIME*
10.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQVRX
Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund
16.81%17.89%19.25%15.94%-1.02%28.56%-0.27%30.35%-14.39%18.68%
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
16.53%17.58%18.93%10.94%-13.89%29.15%-1.19%33.14%-8.01%11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between NQVRX and SMVTX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

0.92

The correlation between NQVRX and SMVTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQVRX vs. SMVTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NQVRX
NQVRX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
NQVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NQVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SMVTX
SMVTX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
SMVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX) and Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NQVRXSMVTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

3.31

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.23

10.95

+3.27

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQVRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SMVTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQVRX and SMVTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQVRX drawdown since its inception was -67.80%, which is greater than SMVTX's maximum drawdown of -54.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQVRX and SMVTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQVRXSMVTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.80%

-54.72%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-8.10%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.93%

-24.75%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-25.44%

+7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.26%

-45.45%

+3.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-7.01%

+6.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.93%

-8.20%

-2.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.45%

-0.51%

Volatility

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund (NQVRX) is 3.28%, while Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund (SMVTX) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that NQVRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMVTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQVRXSMVTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

4.12%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.11%

12.77%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

16.44%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

20.55%

-4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

20.60%

-1.63%

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQVRX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SMVTX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQVRX vs. SMVTX - Dividend Comparison

NQVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than SMVTX's 14.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NQVRX
Nuveen Multi Cap Value Fund
1.60%1.87%1.86%1.29%1.42%1.23%3.40%1.34%0.00%1.99%1.02%1.05%
SMVTX
Virtus Ceredex Mid-Cap Value Equity Fund
14.98%16.44%15.96%1.16%6.75%18.53%2.52%5.82%14.47%20.86%3.61%7.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


NQVRX and SMVTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMVTX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to NQVRX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQVRX dropped -67.80% vs SMVTX's -54.72%.

NQVRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQVRX and SMVTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer