NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE
NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) and 5J50.DE (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while 5J50.DE is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NQSE.DE returned 35.67% vs 16.58% for 5J50.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NQSE.DE charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for 5J50.DE.
Performance
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NQSE.DE achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than 5J50.DE's 4.72% return.
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 6.66%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 17.09%
- 1Y
- 35.67%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.91%
- 10Y*
- —
5J50.DE
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 10.52%
- 1Y
- 16.58%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 17.82% | 32.05% |
5J50.DE iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 4.72% | 32.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between NQSE.DE and 5J50.DE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE — Risk / Return Rank
NQSE.DE
5J50.DE
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (5J50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NQSE.DE | 5J50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.16 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 1.21 | +1.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 3.05 | +7.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NQSE.DE | 5J50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.85 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.76 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NQSE.DE drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, which is greater than 5J50.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQSE.DE and 5J50.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NQSE.DE | 5J50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.67% | -13.56% | -24.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -13.56% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -9.03% | +8.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.56% | -3.60% | -4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 5.39% | -1.99% |
Volatility
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) is 4.75%, while iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (5J50.DE) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that NQSE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 5J50.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NQSE.DE | 5J50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 5.85% | -1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.99% | 15.67% | -3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.05% | 19.44% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 19.31% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.54% | 19.31% | +2.23% |
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NQSE.DE has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than 5J50.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
NQSE.DE vs. 5J50.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither NQSE.DE nor 5J50.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NQSE.DE and 5J50.DE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NQSE.DE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NQSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for 5J50.DE.
NQSE.DE is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while 5J50.DE is Aerospace & Defense. NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while 5J50.DE tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for NQSE.DE and 0.35% for 5J50.DE.
Find the right allocation for NQSE.DE and 5J50.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer