5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (5J50.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE).

5J50.DE and IS3N.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 5J50.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2024. IS3N.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market (IMI). It was launched on May 30, 2014. Both 5J50.DE and IS3N.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (5J50.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
5J50.DE iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	6.84%	32.25%
IS3N.DE iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)	4.55%	24.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 5J50.DE achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly higher than IS3N.DE's 4.55% return.

5J50.DE

• 1D: 4.33%
• 1M: -6.92%
• YTD: 6.84%
• 6M: 6.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IS3N.DE

• 1D: -1.35%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: 4.77%
• 10Y*: 8.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

5J50.DE has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.

5J50.DE

iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

IS3N.DE

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)

Return for Risk

5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3N.DE

IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 64
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (5J50.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	5J50.DE	IS3N.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.30	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.41	0.36	+2.06

Correlation

The correlation between 5J50.DE and IS3N.DE is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither 5J50.DE nor IS3N.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

5J50.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 5J50.DE drawdown since its inception was -11.37%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 5J50.DE and IS3N.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	5J50.DE	IS3N.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-35.06%	+23.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.19%	-8.69%	+1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.60%	-9.41%	+6.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	5J50.DE	IS3N.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.76%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.35%	18.04%	+0.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.35%	15.71%	+2.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.35%	17.89%	+0.46%