PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQGIX vs. RTXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund (NQGIX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQGIX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than RTXAX's 16.52% return.


NQGIX

1D
0.53%
1M
2.04%
YTD
9.87%
6M
12.09%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
19.75%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
10.07%

RTXAX

1D
1.04%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
16.52%
6M
16.24%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
6.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NQGIX
Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund
9.87%27.36%12.36%14.50%-9.28%22.55%1.26%10.01%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
16.52%13.56%1.50%7.40%-11.66%26.57%3.73%6.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NQGIX and RTXAX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2019

0.82

The correlation between NQGIX and RTXAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQGIX vs. RTXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQGIX
NQGIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NQGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
NQGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXAX
RTXAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RTXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund (NQGIX) and Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NQGIXRTXAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

5.36

-1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.95

20.98

-7.03

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the RTXAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQGIX and RTXAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NQGIXRTXAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.59

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.41

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.43

+0.09

Drawdowns

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQGIX drawdown since its inception was -38.52%, smaller than the maximum RTXAX drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQGIX and RTXAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQGIXRTXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.52%

-40.68%

+2.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.26%

-5.21%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.75%

-17.13%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.76%

-24.63%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-1.27%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.45%

-7.78%

+2.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

1.33%

+0.53%

Volatility

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund (NQGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.22% compared to Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund (RTXAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that NQGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQGIXRTXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.03%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

8.05%

+0.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.51%

10.79%

-0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.35%

15.83%

-2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.81%

20.07%

-4.26%

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQGIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than RTXAX's 1.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQGIX vs. RTXAX - Dividend Comparison

NQGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than RTXAX's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NQGIX
Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund
2.20%2.28%2.52%2.54%5.17%3.33%2.71%2.95%5.85%4.03%2.41%3.31%
RTXAX
Russell Investment Tax-Managed Real Assets Fund
2.46%2.86%2.05%1.98%3.11%1.74%1.71%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NQGIX and RTXAX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NQGIX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to RTXAX (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQGIX dropped -38.52% vs RTXAX's -40.68%.

RTXAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQGIX and RTXAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer