NQGIX vs. GSGRX
NQGIX (Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund) and GSGRX (Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund) are both Dividend funds. Over the past 10 years, NQGIX returned 10.30%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for GSGRX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. NQGIX charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for GSGRX.
Performance
NQGIX vs. GSGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NQGIX achieves a 12.98% return, which is significantly lower than GSGRX's 18.68% return. Over the past 10 years, NQGIX has underperformed GSGRX with an annualized return of 10.30%, while GSGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.
NQGIX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 8.02%
- YTD
- 12.98%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 10.30%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.20%
GSGRX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.38%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- YTD
- 18.68%
- 1Y
- 27.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.40%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NQGIX vs. GSGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NQGIX Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund | 12.98% | 27.36% | 12.36% | 14.50% | -9.28% | 22.55% | 1.26% | 24.40% | -14.41% | 18.73% |
GSGRX Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund | 18.68% | 12.48% | 25.98% | 8.19% | -5.28% | 21.83% | 3.49% | 24.98% | -6.11% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between NQGIX and GSGRX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2014 | 0.87 |
The correlation between NQGIX and GSGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NQGIX vs. GSGRX — Risk / Return Rank
NQGIX
GSGRX
NQGIX vs. GSGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund (NQGIX) and Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NQGIX | GSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.43 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 4.58 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 18.09 | -4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NQGIX vs. GSGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NQGIX drawdown since its inception was -38.52%, smaller than the maximum GSGRX drawdown of -54.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQGIX and GSGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NQGIX | GSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.52% | -54.44% | +15.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.26% | -5.48% | -1.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.75% | -19.02% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.76% | -19.02% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.52% | -35.11% | -3.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.11% | +0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.39% | -10.33% | +4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.87% | 1.41% | +0.46% |
Volatility
NQGIX vs. GSGRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund (NQGIX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund (GSGRX) at 2.81%. This indicates that NQGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NQGIX | GSGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.81% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.71% | 7.91% | +0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.86% | 10.42% | +0.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 16.11% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.61% | 17.13% | -1.52% |
NQGIX vs. GSGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NQGIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than GSGRX's 1.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
NQGIX vs. GSGRX - Dividend Comparison
NQGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than GSGRX's 8.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSGRX Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund | 8.42% | 9.72% | 18.35% | 4.70% | 4.42% | 8.01% | 1.52% | 5.56% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.79% | 1.90% |
NQGIX Nuveen Global Equity Income Fund | 2.31% | 2.28% | 2.52% | 2.54% | 5.17% | 3.33% | 2.71% | 2.95% | 5.85% | 4.03% | 2.41% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NQGIX and GSGRX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NQGIX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to GSGRX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQGIX dropped -38.52% vs GSGRX's -54.44%.
GSGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NQGIX and GSGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer