PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQCRX vs. DDVCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQCRX achieves a 16.10% return, which is significantly higher than DDVCX's 5.42% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCRX has outperformed DDVCX with an annualized return of 14.09%, while DDVCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.74% annualized return.


NQCRX

1D
0.62%
1M
2.04%
YTD
16.10%
6M
17.86%
1Y
36.85%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
13.93%
10Y*
14.09%

DDVCX

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
5.42%
6M
6.07%
1Y
16.61%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
6.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
16.10%22.44%17.74%13.76%-1.07%25.38%-0.27%47.63%-15.47%15.46%
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
5.42%9.95%5.68%1.06%-4.57%20.87%-0.63%19.33%-3.92%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCRX and DDVCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2006

0.90

The correlation between NQCRX and DDVCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQCRX vs. DDVCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQCRX
NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

DDVCX
DDVCX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
DDVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
DDVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NQCRXDDVCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

1.45

+1.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

2.14

+2.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.26

+0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.31

2.01

+4.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.54

5.88

+17.66

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCRX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the DDVCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCRX and DDVCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NQCRXDDVCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

1.45

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.30

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.40

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.38

+0.02

Drawdowns

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCRX drawdown since its inception was -57.85%, which is greater than DDVCX's maximum drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCRX and DDVCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQCRXDDVCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.85%

-54.29%

-3.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.07%

-8.59%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-18.71%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.61%

-18.71%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

-37.60%

-4.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-4.39%

+3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-9.04%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.93%

-1.31%

Volatility

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a higher volatility of 3.84% compared to Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) at 3.08%. This indicates that NQCRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQCRXDDVCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.84%

3.08%

+0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.51%

8.89%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

11.93%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

14.56%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

17.07%

+1.86%

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCRX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than DDVCX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQCRX vs. DDVCX - Dividend Comparison

NQCRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, less than DDVCX's 25.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
25.08%26.55%30.88%10.78%9.46%23.96%1.92%4.13%5.29%3.08%1.57%1.97%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
6.29%7.30%6.82%2.22%4.63%20.85%17.95%26.88%34.12%27.42%10.74%61.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


NQCRX and DDVCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to DDVCX (3.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCRX dropped -57.85% vs DDVCX's -54.29%.

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQCRX and DDVCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer