PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NQCFX vs. VTMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQCFX achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly higher than VTMGX's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX has outperformed VTMGX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while VTMGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.


NQCFX

1D
1.25%
1M
7.41%
YTD
18.66%
6M
17.80%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*
11.38%

VTMGX

1D
0.26%
1M
6.03%
YTD
15.89%
6M
19.15%
1Y
33.58%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NQCFX
Northquest Capital Fund
18.66%10.85%7.08%27.28%-26.10%32.62%19.65%35.76%-2.05%14.23%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
15.89%35.17%3.03%17.65%-15.33%11.39%10.25%22.04%-14.48%26.39%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCFX and VTMGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2002

0.71

The correlation between NQCFX and VTMGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NQCFX vs. VTMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQCFX
NQCFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
NQCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VTMGX
VTMGX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VTMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NQCFXVTMGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.39

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.81

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

10.88

-1.10

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VTMGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCFX and VTMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NQCFXVTMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.17

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.63

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

0.62

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

0.31

-0.30

Drawdowns

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than VTMGX's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and VTMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NQCFXVTMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.46%

-60.58%

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-11.67%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.46%

-13.18%

-84.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-97.46%

-29.71%

-67.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-97.46%

-35.68%

-61.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.17%

0.00%

-96.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-14.66%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.01%

0.00%

Volatility

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) is 4.42%, while Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTMGX) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that NQCFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NQCFXVTMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.42%

4.97%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.43%

12.53%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

15.11%

+1.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,578.46%

15.87%

+1,562.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,116.43%

16.54%

+1,099.89%

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than VTMGX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NQCFX vs. VTMGX - Dividend Comparison

NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than VTMGX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NQCFX
Northquest Capital Fund
1.29%1.53%0.00%0.97%1.13%6.41%11.55%3.07%6.04%0.00%0.00%3.42%
VTMGX
Vanguard Developed Markets Index Fund Admiral Shares
2.58%3.20%3.34%3.14%2.88%3.14%2.02%3.03%3.33%2.77%3.06%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NQCFX and VTMGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMGX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to NQCFX (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCFX dropped -97.46% vs VTMGX's -60.58%.

VTMGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NQCFX and VTMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer