NQCFX vs. FBRNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NQCFX (Northquest Capital Fund) and FBRNX (Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX returned 11.38%/yr vs 15.24%/yr for FBRNX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NQCFX charges 1.47%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FBRNX.

Performance

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I (FBRNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NQCFX achieves a 18.66% return, which is significantly higher than FBRNX's 15.11% return. Over the past 10 years, NQCFX has underperformed FBRNX with an annualized return of 11.38%, while FBRNX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.24% annualized return.

NQCFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 6.04%
• YTD: 18.66%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: 28.35%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: 11.38%

FBRNX

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 15.11%
• 6M: 15.54%
• 1Y: 36.34%
• 3Y*: 22.56%
• 5Y*: 12.74%
• 10Y*: 15.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund	18.66%	10.85%	7.08%	27.28%	-26.10%	32.62%	19.65%	35.76%	-2.05%	14.23%
FBRNX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I	15.11%	18.84%	19.74%	26.90%	-19.59%	22.96%	24.89%	32.20%	-8.66%	24.44%

Correlation

The correlation between NQCFX and FBRNX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013	0.89

The correlation between NQCFX and FBRNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NQCFX vs. FBRNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NQCFX

NQCFX Risk / Return Rank: 42
NQCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NQCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
NQCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
NQCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
NQCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FBRNX

FBRNX Risk / Return Rank: 85
FBRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FBRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FBRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FBRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FBRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) and Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I (FBRNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NQCFX	FBRNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.82	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	3.80	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.51	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	3.98	-1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.42	19.28	-9.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NQCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the FBRNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NQCFX and FBRNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NQCFX	FBRNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	2.82	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.72	-0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01	0.82	-0.81
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.83	-0.82

Drawdowns

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NQCFX drawdown since its inception was -97.46%, which is greater than FBRNX's maximum drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NQCFX and FBRNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NQCFX	FBRNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.46%	-34.37%	-63.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.09%	-9.21%	-1.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-97.46%	-20.87%	-76.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.46%	-25.29%	-72.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-97.46%	-34.37%	-63.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.17%	-0.60%	-95.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.37%	-4.43%	-9.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	1.90%	+1.11%

Volatility

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Volatility Comparison

Northquest Capital Fund (NQCFX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I (FBRNX) at 3.46%. This indicates that NQCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBRNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NQCFX	FBRNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	3.46%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	10.01%	+3.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	13.00%	+3.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,578.46%	17.76%	+1,560.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,116.20%	18.56%	+1,097.64%

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NQCFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FBRNX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

NQCFX vs. FBRNX - Dividend Comparison

NQCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, less than FBRNX's 3.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBRNX Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector All Cap Fund Class I	3.99%	4.60%	4.66%	1.94%	0.35%	0.00%	5.15%	5.28%	4.39%	3.07%	0.99%	5.06%
NQCFX Northquest Capital Fund	1.29%	1.53%	0.00%	0.97%	1.13%	6.41%	11.55%	3.07%	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%	3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NQCFX and FBRNX in my portfolio?

NQCFX and FBRNX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NQCFX or FBRNX?

NQCFX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FBRNX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NQCFX dropped -97.46% vs FBRNX's -34.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBRNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.