NOWL vs. BEG
NOWL (GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF) and BEG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. NOWL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BEG.
Performance
NOWL vs. BEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOWL achieves a -55.17% return, which is significantly lower than BEG's 552.25% return.
NOWL
- 1D
- -15.19%
- 1M
- 53.22%
- YTD
- -55.17%
- 6M
- -63.42%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEG
- 1D
- -9.38%
- 1M
- -7.23%
- YTD
- 552.25%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOWL vs. BEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NOWL GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF | -55.17% | -4.53% |
BEG Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF | 552.25% | -5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOWL and BEG is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOWL vs. BEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF (NOWL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BE Daily ETF (BEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOWL | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | 24.77 | -25.53 |
Drawdowns
NOWL vs. BEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOWL drawdown since its inception was -86.57%, which is greater than BEG's maximum drawdown of -59.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOWL and BEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOWL | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.57% | -59.85% | -26.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.11% | -13.90% | -62.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.53% | -16.14% | -31.39% |
Volatility
NOWL vs. BEG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOWL | BEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.33% | 213.85% | -110.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 213.85% | -110.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.33% | 213.85% | -110.52% |
NOWL vs. BEG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOWL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BEG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOWL vs. BEG - Dividend Comparison
Neither NOWL nor BEG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOWL and BEG have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BEG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BEG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for NOWL.
NOWL and BEG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for NOWL and 0.75% for BEG.
Find the right allocation for NOWL and BEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer