PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOTEX vs. MPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOTEX vs. MPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Tax Exempt Fund (NOTEX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOTEX achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than MPA's 4.24% return. Over the past 10 years, NOTEX has underperformed MPA with an annualized return of 1.58%, while MPA has yielded a comparatively higher 1.84% annualized return.


NOTEX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.86%
1Y
6.82%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
1.58%

MPA

1D
0.35%
1M
0.42%
YTD
4.24%
6M
2.92%
1Y
10.49%
3Y*
4.87%
5Y*
-1.27%
10Y*
1.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOTEX vs. MPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOTEX
Northern Tax Exempt Fund
1.51%3.59%2.21%5.25%-12.23%0.84%4.99%7.88%0.64%5.13%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
4.24%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%

Correlation

The correlation between NOTEX and MPA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994

0.24

The correlation between NOTEX and MPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.38 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOTEX vs. MPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOTEX
NOTEX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NOTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOTEX vs. MPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Tax Exempt Fund (NOTEX) and BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOTEXMPADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.24

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

1.64

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

6.53

+2.06

NOTEX vs. MPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOTEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the MPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOTEX and MPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOTEXMPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.30

+1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.11

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.15

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.37

+0.63

Drawdowns

NOTEX vs. MPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOTEX drawdown since its inception was -17.48%, smaller than the maximum MPA drawdown of -44.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOTEX and MPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOTEXMPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-44.78%

+27.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.68%

-6.42%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.00%

-15.25%

+9.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.48%

-38.10%

+20.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.48%

-38.10%

+20.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-17.04%

+15.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.39%

-9.77%

+7.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

1.62%

-0.79%

Volatility

NOTEX vs. MPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Tax Exempt Fund (NOTEX) is 1.19%, while BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) has a volatility of 2.45%. This indicates that NOTEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOTEXMPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

2.45%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.12%

6.25%

-4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

8.12%

-5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.33%

12.12%

-7.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

12.32%

-8.03%

NOTEX vs. MPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOTEX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than MPA's 2.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOTEX vs. MPA - Dividend Comparison

NOTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, less than MPA's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
6.03%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%
NOTEX
Northern Tax Exempt Fund
3.38%3.25%3.76%2.88%1.76%1.93%2.54%3.40%3.28%3.37%2.78%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOTEX and MPA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPA has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to NOTEX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOTEX dropped -17.48% vs MPA's -44.78%.

NOTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOTEX and MPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer