PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOSIX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOSIX achieves a 11.68% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return. Over the past 10 years, NOSIX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 15.56%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.16% annualized return.


NOSIX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.79%
YTD
11.68%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.94%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
14.18%
10Y*
15.56%

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOSIX
Northern Stock Index Fund
11.68%17.83%24.87%26.24%-18.25%28.55%18.33%31.35%-4.54%21.71%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between NOSIX and RESGX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between NOSIX and RESGX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOSIX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOSIX
NOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
NOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOSIXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.56

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

5.89

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.86

21.39

-5.53

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOSIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOSIX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOSIXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

3.21

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.61

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

0.71

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.72

-0.21

Drawdowns

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOSIX drawdown since its inception was -55.42%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOSIX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOSIXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.42%

-37.80%

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-7.84%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-20.50%

+1.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.54%

-23.58%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.82%

-37.80%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.33%

-5.00%

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.15%

-0.26%

Volatility

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX) is 2.82%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that NOSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOSIXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

5.45%

-2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

11.00%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

14.41%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

17.26%

-0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

18.71%

-0.50%

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOSIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOSIX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

NOSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOSIX
Northern Stock Index Fund
2.64%2.94%2.59%5.02%4.72%3.22%4.00%2.41%4.82%3.13%2.76%3.36%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOSIX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to NOSIX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOSIX dropped -55.42% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOSIX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer