PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOSGX vs. NOBOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOSGX achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than NOBOX's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NOSGX has outperformed NOBOX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while NOBOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.14% annualized return.


NOSGX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.72%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.39%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.52%

NOBOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
16.32%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
0.04%6.14%0.82%4.86%-13.84%-2.10%7.20%8.73%-0.17%3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NOSGX and NOBOX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

-0.18

The correlation between NOSGX and NOBOX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOSGX vs. NOBOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBOX
NOBOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NOBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOSGXNOBOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.23

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

1.56

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.59

4.71

+9.88

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the NOBOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOSGX and NOBOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOSGXNOBOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.24

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.10

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.23

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.59

-0.19

Drawdowns

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than NOBOX's maximum drawdown of -20.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOSGX and NOBOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOSGXNOBOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-20.03%

-36.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-3.28%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.13%

-6.27%

-21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-19.15%

-9.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.66%

-20.03%

-25.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

-5.92%

+5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-3.54%

-5.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

1.08%

+1.52%

Volatility

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) at 1.49%. This indicates that NOSGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOSGXNOBOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

1.49%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

3.05%

+8.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

4.13%

+13.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

6.09%

+17.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

5.03%

+19.53%

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOSGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBOX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOSGX vs. NOBOX - Dividend Comparison

NOSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.82%, more than NOBOX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
3.74%2.88%3.46%2.63%1.53%2.10%3.12%3.18%2.80%2.77%2.45%2.61%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.82%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOSGX and NOBOX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOSGX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to NOBOX (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOSGX dropped -56.92% vs NOBOX's -20.03%.

NOSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOSGX and NOBOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer