PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOSGX vs. NMMEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOSGX achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly lower than NMMEX's 33.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NOSGX has underperformed NMMEX with an annualized return of 8.52%, while NMMEX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.


NOSGX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.72%
YTD
16.32%
6M
15.39%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
8.52%

NMMEX

1D
0.97%
1M
10.94%
YTD
33.21%
6M
36.58%
1Y
63.79%
3Y*
27.00%
5Y*
9.06%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
16.32%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%
NMMEX
Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund
33.21%34.16%6.63%12.12%-22.33%-1.22%18.85%16.26%-14.90%35.41%

Correlation

The correlation between NOSGX and NMMEX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2008

0.63

The correlation between NOSGX and NMMEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOSGX vs. NMMEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NMMEX
NMMEX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
NMMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NMMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOSGXNMMEXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

3.73

-1.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.18

4.55

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.70

-0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

4.62

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.59

18.28

-3.69

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the NMMEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOSGX and NMMEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOSGXNMMEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

3.73

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.39

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.51

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.48

-0.08

Drawdowns

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than NMMEX's maximum drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOSGX and NMMEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOSGXNMMEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-44.64%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-14.25%

+5.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.13%

-16.13%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-44.64%

+16.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.66%

-44.64%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.05%

-15.02%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

3.56%

-0.96%

Volatility

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) is 4.74%, while Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX) has a volatility of 7.50%. This indicates that NOSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMMEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOSGXNMMEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

7.50%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

15.55%

-3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.79%

17.69%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.84%

23.63%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.56%

21.50%

+3.06%

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOSGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NMMEX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOSGX vs. NMMEX - Dividend Comparison

NOSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.82%, more than NMMEX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMMEX
Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund
1.45%1.93%0.80%1.82%0.89%29.82%6.99%8.34%0.99%0.00%1.90%4.46%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.82%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOSGX and NMMEX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMMEX has higher volatility (7.50%) compared to NOSGX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOSGX dropped -56.92% vs NMMEX's -44.64%.

NMMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.73 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOSGX and NMMEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer