PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOSGX vs. FISVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOSGX achieves a 18.41% return, which is significantly lower than FISVX's 21.13% return.


NOSGX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.39%
YTD
18.41%
6M
16.21%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.06%

FISVX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.64%
YTD
21.13%
6M
19.07%
1Y
43.06%
3Y*
19.67%
5Y*
7.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
18.41%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%6.94%
FISVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund
21.13%12.70%8.16%14.72%-14.42%28.26%4.49%9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NOSGX and FISVX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.96

The correlation between NOSGX and FISVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOSGX vs. FISVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FISVX
FISVX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FISVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FISVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOSGXFISVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

5.30

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.61

17.98

-3.37

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOSGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FISVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOSGX and FISVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.92%, which is greater than FISVX's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOSGX and FISVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOSGXFISVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.92%

-44.66%

-12.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.07%

-8.54%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.13%

-26.50%

-1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-26.50%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.17%

0.00%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.04%

-10.27%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.51%

+0.09%

Volatility

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) is 4.98%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that NOSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOSGXFISVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.98%

5.27%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.07%

12.46%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

18.27%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.82%

21.70%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

26.69%

-2.11%

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOSGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FISVX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOSGX vs. FISVX - Dividend Comparison

NOSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.15%, more than FISVX's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund
1.80%2.18%1.70%2.06%3.69%9.55%1.33%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.15%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOSGX and FISVX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISVX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to NOSGX (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOSGX dropped -56.92% vs FISVX's -44.66%.

FISVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOSGX and FISVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer