NOM vs. ATOIX
NOM (Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund) and ATOIX (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NOM vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NOM
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
NOM vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOM Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund | -5.66% | 6.89% | 27.11% | -0.84% | -26.11% | 8.91% | 1.20% | 30.63% | -15.20% | -3.04% |
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 1.01% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 3.27% | 0.87% | -0.04% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 1.54% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOM and ATOIX is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2002 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOM vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank
NOM
ATOIX
NOM vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund (NOM) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOM | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 2.47 | — |
Drawdowns
NOM vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOM | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.06% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.03% | — |
Volatility
NOM vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOM | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 0.79% | — |
Dividends
NOM vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison
NOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.28%, more than ATOIX's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 2.98% | 3.27% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 1.07% | 0.06% | 0.88% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 2.20% | 0.61% | 0.52% |
NOM Nuveen Missouri Quality Municipal Income Fund | 6.28% | 6.58% | 5.45% | 3.17% | 4.45% | 3.60% | 3.43% | 3.60% | 4.82% | 4.74% | 4.51% | 4.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOM and ATOIX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for NOM and ATOIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer