PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOLVX vs. TMMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Large Cap Value Fund (NOLVX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOLVX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than TMMAX's 5.01% return. Over the past 10 years, NOLVX has outperformed TMMAX with an annualized return of 11.35%, while TMMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.08% annualized return.


NOLVX

1D
0.75%
1M
4.26%
YTD
11.75%
6M
12.74%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
11.35%

TMMAX

1D
0.06%
1M
1.81%
YTD
5.01%
6M
5.26%
1Y
10.22%
3Y*
12.88%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOLVX
Northern Large Cap Value Fund
11.75%18.01%13.56%10.09%-6.16%28.41%1.32%25.95%-8.52%12.55%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
5.01%11.03%17.07%7.32%-3.11%24.10%1.32%24.00%-2.84%15.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NOLVX and TMMAX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2007

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between NOLVX and TMMAX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOLVX vs. TMMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOLVX
NOLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NOLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

TMMAX
TMMAX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TMMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TMMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Large Cap Value Fund (NOLVX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOLVXTMMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.22

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.99

1.82

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.15

6.36

+12.79

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the TMMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOLVX and TMMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOLVXTMMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.28

+1.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.51

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.57

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.54

-0.16

Drawdowns

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOLVX drawdown since its inception was -58.73%, which is greater than TMMAX's maximum drawdown of -41.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOLVX and TMMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOLVXTMMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.73%

-41.50%

-17.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.18%

-5.78%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.01%

-23.00%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.95%

-23.00%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.75%

-33.41%

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.35%

+6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-5.57%

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.65%

-0.05%

Volatility

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Large Cap Value Fund (NOLVX) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund (TMMAX) at 2.04%. This indicates that NOLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOLVXTMMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.04%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

5.85%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

8.21%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

19.07%

-3.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

17.81%

+0.15%

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOLVX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than TMMAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOLVX vs. TMMAX - Dividend Comparison

NOLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than TMMAX's 24.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOLVX
Northern Large Cap Value Fund
4.20%4.70%7.80%5.56%8.37%8.20%1.46%2.01%1.71%2.34%1.52%1.68%
TMMAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Tax-Managed Managed Volatility Fund
24.09%25.19%23.39%15.23%6.54%4.73%2.15%3.67%4.91%4.10%4.17%5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOLVX and TMMAX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOLVX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to TMMAX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOLVX dropped -58.73% vs TMMAX's -41.50%.

NOLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOLVX and TMMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer