NOIEX vs. FSTAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NOIEX (Northern Income Equity Fund) and FSTAX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - NOIEX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Northern Funds, while FSTAX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, NOIEX returned 14.02%/yr vs 4.02%/yr for FSTAX. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NOIEX charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for FSTAX.

Performance

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIEX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than FSTAX's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, NOIEX has outperformed FSTAX with an annualized return of 14.02%, while FSTAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.02% annualized return.

NOIEX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 6.04%
• YTD: 12.80%
• 6M: 13.13%
• 1Y: 30.77%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: 14.24%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

FSTAX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 1.08%
• YTD: 3.19%
• 6M: 3.50%
• 1Y: 9.60%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: 2.83%
• 10Y*: 4.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund	12.80%	18.81%	24.28%	19.56%	-13.34%	27.96%	11.03%	27.04%	-6.62%	20.22%
FSTAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A	3.19%	8.68%	4.93%	8.82%	-11.98%	3.22%	7.21%	10.74%	-2.94%	7.63%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIEX and FSTAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1994	0.31

Over the past year, NOIEX and FSTAX have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

NOIEX vs. FSTAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOIEX

NOIEX Risk / Return Rank: 83
NOIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
NOIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
NOIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NOIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
NOIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FSTAX

FSTAX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FSTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
FSTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FSTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FSTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
FSTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOIEX	FSTAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.74	2.81	-0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	4.24	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.59	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.85	3.74	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.52	16.22	+1.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is comparable to the FSTAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIEX and FSTAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOIEX	FSTAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.74	2.81	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.63	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	0.91	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.51	+0.18

Drawdowns

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIEX drawdown since its inception was -45.66%, which is greater than FSTAX's maximum drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIEX and FSTAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOIEX	FSTAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.66%	-23.29%	-22.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.39%	-2.65%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.06%	-4.04%	-14.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.89%	-16.18%	-5.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.31%	-16.18%	-19.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-4.83%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	0.61%	+1.21%

Volatility

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Volatility Comparison

Northern Income Equity Fund (NOIEX) has a higher volatility of 2.73% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A (FSTAX) at 1.35%. This indicates that NOIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOIEX	FSTAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.73%	1.35%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.71%	2.89%	+5.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.78%	3.54%	+8.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.36%	4.49%	+11.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	4.44%	+13.52%

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIEX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FSTAX's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

NOIEX vs. FSTAX - Dividend Comparison

NOIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than FSTAX's 4.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSTAX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Income Fund Class A	4.01%	4.05%	3.21%	3.70%	2.70%	4.01%	4.32%	4.06%	3.50%	3.70%	3.49%	2.89%
NOIEX Northern Income Equity Fund	7.15%	7.92%	6.11%	7.03%	5.44%	14.26%	7.67%	8.58%	15.73%	7.56%	3.02%	5.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NOIEX and FSTAX in my portfolio?

NOIEX and FSTAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NOIEX or FSTAX?

NOIEX has higher volatility (2.73%) compared to FSTAX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIEX dropped -45.66% vs FSTAX's -23.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.