PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOIAX vs. EPDPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOIAX achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than EPDPX's 9.36% return. Over the past 10 years, NOIAX has underperformed EPDPX with an annualized return of 7.59%, while EPDPX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.15% annualized return.


NOIAX

1D
0.82%
1M
3.65%
6M
3.07%
YTD
6.51%
1Y
17.61%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
7.59%
ALL TIME*
6.18%

EPDPX

1D
1.71%
1M
3.48%
6M
0.38%
YTD
9.36%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
9.15%
ALL TIME*
6.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOIAX
Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund
6.51%32.80%-5.28%18.93%-15.88%8.73%4.06%24.35%-24.20%29.57%
EPDPX
EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A
9.36%61.93%0.72%7.46%1.27%7.78%8.83%13.05%-11.02%15.53%

Correlation

The correlation between NOIAX and EPDPX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2014

0.68

The correlation between NOIAX and EPDPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOIAX vs. EPDPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NOIAX
NOIAX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
NOIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
NOIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

EPDPX
EPDPX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EPDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
EPDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) and EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOIAXEPDPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.39

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.98

8.57

-4.59

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the EPDPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOIAX and EPDPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOIAX drawdown since its inception was -53.97%, which is greater than EPDPX's maximum drawdown of -39.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOIAX and EPDPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOIAXEPDPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.97%

-39.21%

-14.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.34%

-10.96%

-3.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.69%

-13.15%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.18%

-21.06%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.97%

-33.34%

-20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-6.43%

+6.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.50%

-11.15%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.63%

4.33%

+0.30%

Volatility

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Volatility Comparison

Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A (EPDPX) at 3.71%. This indicates that NOIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPDPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOIAXEPDPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

3.71%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

12.36%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

14.83%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.39%

14.12%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

14.83%

+7.18%

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOIAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EPDPX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOIAX vs. EPDPX - Dividend Comparison

NOIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than EPDPX's 6.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPDPX
EuroPac International Dividend Income Fund Class A
6.03%6.55%3.82%3.08%2.56%2.07%1.70%2.43%2.66%2.69%2.24%3.58%
NOIAX
Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund
2.92%3.11%2.96%1.72%1.77%1.55%0.24%2.99%4.56%1.04%2.07%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOIAX and EPDPX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOIAX has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to EPDPX (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOIAX dropped -53.97% vs EPDPX's -39.21%.

EPDPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOIAX and EPDPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer