PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOFIX vs. NOBOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOFIX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly higher than NOBOX's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, NOFIX has outperformed NOBOX with an annualized return of 1.58%, while NOBOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.14% annualized return.


NOFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.11%
1Y
5.53%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
1.58%

NOBOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
5.04%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
1.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOFIX
Northern Fixed Income Fund
0.15%6.39%1.44%5.32%-14.91%-0.36%7.85%10.76%-2.15%4.42%
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
0.04%6.14%0.82%4.86%-13.84%-2.10%7.20%8.73%-0.17%3.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NOFIX and NOBOX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.94

The correlation between NOFIX and NOBOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOFIX vs. NOBOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOFIX
NOFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NOFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
NOFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBOX
NOBOX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
NOBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) and Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NOFIXNOBOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.56

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

4.71

+0.61

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the NOBOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOFIX and NOBOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NOFIXNOBOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.06

-0.10

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

0.23

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.88

0.59

+0.29

Drawdowns

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOFIX drawdown since its inception was -20.04%, roughly equal to the maximum NOBOX drawdown of -20.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOFIX and NOBOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOFIXNOBOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.04%

-20.03%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-3.28%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.61%

-6.27%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.04%

-19.15%

-0.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.04%

-20.03%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.33%

-5.92%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.55%

-3.54%

+0.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

1.08%

-0.04%

Volatility

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Fixed Income Fund (NOFIX) is 1.36%, while Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) has a volatility of 1.49%. This indicates that NOFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOBOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOFIXNOBOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.49%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

3.05%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

4.13%

-0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.98%

6.09%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

5.03%

-0.08%

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOFIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBOX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOFIX vs. NOBOX - Dividend Comparison

NOFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%, more than NOBOX's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
3.74%2.88%3.46%2.63%1.53%2.10%3.12%3.18%2.80%2.77%2.45%2.61%
NOFIX
Northern Fixed Income Fund
4.17%3.24%3.93%3.11%1.91%2.17%2.77%3.03%3.64%3.33%2.53%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, NOFIX and NOBOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NOBOX has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to NOFIX (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOFIX dropped -20.04% vs NOBOX's -20.03%.

NOFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOFIX and NOBOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer