NOEQ vs. RSSY
NOEQ (Northern Trust US Equity ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NOEQ charges 0.12%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.
Performance
NOEQ vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NOEQ
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSY
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 30.97%
- YTD
- 31.59%
- 1Y
- 37.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOEQ vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NOEQ Northern Trust US Equity ETF | 13.97% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOEQ and RSSY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOEQ vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank
NOEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSSY
NOEQ vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust US Equity ETF (NOEQ) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOEQ | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.50 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.34 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOEQ vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOEQ drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOEQ and RSSY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOEQ | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -29.57% | +25.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -1.29% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -7.14% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.22% | — |
Volatility
NOEQ vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOEQ | RSSY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 13.80% | -0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 18.27% | -4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 18.27% | -4.67% |
NOEQ vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOEQ has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOEQ vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison
NOEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than RSSY's 1.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NOEQ Northern Trust US Equity ETF | 0.17% | 0.00% |
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF | 1.55% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOEQ and RSSY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NOEQ is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NOEQ is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.
RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.17% for NOEQ.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NOEQ and 1.04% for RSSY.
Find the right allocation for NOEQ and RSSY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer