NOEQ vs. ESN
NOEQ (Northern Trust US Equity ETF) and ESN (Essential 40 Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. NOEQ is actively managed, while ESN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NOEQ charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for ESN.
Performance
NOEQ vs. ESN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
NOEQ
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESN
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOEQ vs. ESN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
NOEQ Northern Trust US Equity ETF | 13.97% |
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 15.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOEQ and ESN is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOEQ vs. ESN — Risk / Return Rank
NOEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ESN
NOEQ vs. ESN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Trust US Equity ETF (NOEQ) and Essential 40 Stock ETF (ESN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NOEQ | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.49 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NOEQ vs. ESN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOEQ drawdown since its inception was -3.70%, smaller than the maximum ESN drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOEQ and ESN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOEQ | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.70% | -13.60% | +9.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | 0.00% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -1.85% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility
NOEQ vs. ESN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOEQ | ESN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 9.93% | +3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 13.21% | +0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 13.21% | +0.39% |
NOEQ vs. ESN - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOEQ has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ESN's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOEQ vs. ESN - Dividend Comparison
NOEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than ESN's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ESN Essential 40 Stock ETF | 0.78% | 0.91% | 0.76% |
NOEQ Northern Trust US Equity ETF | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOEQ and ESN have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NOEQ is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NOEQ is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for ESN.
ESN has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.17% for NOEQ.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and KKM Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for NOEQ and 0.70% for ESN.
Find the right allocation for NOEQ and ESN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer