NODE vs. XRPZ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) and XRPZ (Franklin XRP ETF) are both Blockchain funds. NODE is actively managed, while XRPZ is passively managed. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NODE charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for XRPZ.

Performance

NODE vs. XRPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NODE achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly higher than XRPZ's -42.09% return.

NODE

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -7.11%
• 6M: -1.11%
• YTD: 7.73%
• 1Y: 25.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 33.91%

XRPZ

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -2.12%
• 6M: -38.99%
• YTD: -42.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	$281.15K	$306.49K	$518.92K
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	$2.60M	$2.66M	$3.48M

NODE vs. XRPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	7.73%	2.94%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	-42.09%	-11.90%

Correlation

The correlation between NODE and XRPZ is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2025	0.64

Return for Risk

NODE vs. XRPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NODE

NODE Risk / Return Rank: 22
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 23
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 20

XRPZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NODE vs. XRPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and Franklin XRP ETF (XRPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NODE	XRPZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.19	—	—

Drawdowns

NODE vs. XRPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum XRPZ drawdown of -55.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and XRPZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NODE	XRPZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.35%	-55.39%	+20.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.12%	-54.16%	+33.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.37%	-35.12%	+23.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.88%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NODE	XRPZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.06%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.93%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.60%	69.40%	-18.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.18%	69.40%	-22.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.18%	69.40%	-22.22%

NODE vs. XRPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than XRPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

NODE vs. XRPZ - Dividend Comparison

NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while XRPZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	1.04%	1.12%
XRPZ Franklin XRP ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NODE and XRPZ in my portfolio?

NODE and XRPZ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NODE or XRPZ?

On fees, XRPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NODE or XRPZ?

XRPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for NODE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NODE or XRPZ?

NODE has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.00% for XRPZ.

What is the main difference between NODE and XRPZ?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 0.19% for XRPZ.