NODE vs. BWET

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NODE (VanEck Onchain Economy ETF) and BWET (Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NODE is a Blockchain fund actively managed by VanEck, while BWET is a Commodities fund tracking the Breakwave Wet Freight Futures Index. NODE is actively managed, while BWET is passively managed. Over the past year, NODE returned 71.73% vs 1800.91% for BWET. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. NODE charges 0.69%/yr vs 3.50%/yr for BWET.

Performance

NODE vs. BWET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NODE achieves a 33.28% return, which is significantly lower than BWET's 875.88% return.

NODE

• 1D: -1.79%
• 1M: 10.04%
• YTD: 33.28%
• 6M: 21.22%
• 1Y: 71.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BWET

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 9.15%
• YTD: 875.88%
• 6M: 735.56%
• 1Y: 1,800.91%
• 3Y*: 129.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NODE vs. BWET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	33.28%	32.44%
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	875.88%	62.23%

Correlation

The correlation between NODE and BWET is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

NODE vs. BWET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NODE

NODE Risk / Return Rank: 41
NODE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
NODE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
NODE Omega Ratio Rank: 41
NODE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
NODE Martin Ratio Rank: 31

BWET

BWET Risk / Return Rank: 99
BWET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Omega Ratio Rank: 97
BWET Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BWET Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NODE vs. BWET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) and Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NODE	BWET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	18.57	-16.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	6.55	-4.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.96	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	59.51	-57.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	158.07	-153.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NODE vs. BWET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NODE Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the BWET Sharpe Ratio of 18.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NODE and BWET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NODE	BWET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	18.57	-16.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	1.90	-0.28

Drawdowns

NODE vs. BWET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NODE drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, smaller than the maximum BWET drawdown of -56.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NODE and BWET.

Drawdown Indicators

	NODE	BWET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.35%	-56.90%	+21.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.35%	-30.64%	-4.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-56.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.42%	-11.29%	+8.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-24.09%	+12.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.00%	11.51%	+4.49%

Volatility

NODE vs. BWET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Onchain Economy ETF (NODE) is 12.39%, while Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF (BWET) has a volatility of 33.96%. This indicates that NODE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NODE	BWET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.39%	33.96%	-21.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.83%	88.49%	-53.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.44%	98.35%	-52.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.59%	70.45%	-25.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.59%	70.45%	-25.86%

NODE vs. BWET - Expense Ratio Comparison

NODE has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than BWET's 3.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

NODE vs. BWET - Dividend Comparison

NODE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, while BWET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BWET Breakwave Tanker Shipping ETF	0.00%	0.00%
NODE VanEck Onchain Economy ETF	0.84%	1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NODE and BWET in my portfolio?

NODE and BWET have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NODE or BWET?

BWET has higher volatility (33.96%) compared to NODE (12.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NODE dropped -35.35% vs BWET's -56.90%.

Which ETF is better, NODE or BWET?

On 1-year performance, BWET leads with 1800.91% vs 71.73% for NODE. On fees, NODE is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, NODE has been the lower-risk option at 12.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NODE or BWET?

Over the 1-year period, BWET has performed better with a 1800.91% return vs 71.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NODE or BWET?

NODE is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 3.50% for BWET.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NODE or BWET?

NODE has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.00% for BWET.

What is the main difference between NODE and BWET?

NODE is categorized as Blockchain, while BWET is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for NODE and 3.50% for BWET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BWET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.57 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.