NOCT vs. LOUP
NOCT (Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. NOCT is actively managed, while LOUP is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NOCT returned 10.46%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for LOUP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NOCT charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
NOCT vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOCT achieves a 7.61% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 28.21% return.
NOCT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.54%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 7.69%
- 1Y
- 17.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 75.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
NOCT vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October | 7.61% | 12.81% | 12.10% | 30.67% | -13.42% | 12.10% | 11.64% | 5.54% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 28.21% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 18.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOCT and LOUP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.77 |
The correlation between NOCT and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
NOCT vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NOCT
LOUP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
NOCT
LOUP
Communication Services
NOCT
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
NOCT
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
NOCT
LOUP
-
Healthcare
NOCT
LOUP
Industrials
NOCT
LOUP
Utilities
NOCT
LOUP
Basic Materials
NOCT
LOUP
-
Energy
NOCT
LOUP
Financial Services
NOCT
LOUP
Real Estate
NOCT
LOUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOCT vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
NOCT
LOUP
NOCT vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.41 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.61 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.90 | 12.23 | +1.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.66 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 | 0.40 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.01 | 0.59 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
NOCT vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOCT drawdown since its inception was -16.21%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOCT and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.21% | -58.68% | +42.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.84% | -21.00% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.70% | -35.23% | +22.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -55.63% | +39.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.87% | +1.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -20.04% | +17.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 6.19% | -4.94% |
Volatility
NOCT vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) is 1.01%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that NOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOCT | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.01% | 8.23% | -7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 21.94% | -16.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 28.51% | -20.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.93% | 32.38% | -21.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.19% | 31.96% | -20.77% |
NOCT vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
NOCT vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither NOCT nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOCT Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NOCT and LOUP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to NOCT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOCT dropped -16.21% vs LOUP's -58.68%.
On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 12.98% vs 10.46% for NOCT. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, NOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOCT.
NOCT and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for NOCT and 0.70% for LOUP.
LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOCT and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer