PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOBOX vs. NOSGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) and Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOBOX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly lower than NOSGX's 18.41% return. Over the past 10 years, NOBOX has underperformed NOSGX with an annualized return of 1.04%, while NOSGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.06% annualized return.


NOBOX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.70%
YTD
-0.28%
6M
-0.18%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
3.07%
5Y*
-0.76%
10Y*
1.04%

NOSGX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.39%
YTD
18.41%
6M
16.21%
1Y
35.48%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
7.67%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
-0.28%6.14%0.82%4.86%-13.84%-2.10%7.20%8.73%-0.17%3.60%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
18.41%10.63%2.60%15.67%-10.50%26.17%-2.29%22.30%-13.79%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between NOBOX and NOSGX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2007

-0.18

The correlation between NOBOX and NOSGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOBOX vs. NOSGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOBOX
NOBOX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
NOBOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

NOSGX
NOSGX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) and Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOBOXNOSGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.38

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

4.22

-2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.57

14.61

-11.05

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOBOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the NOSGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOBOX and NOSGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOBOX drawdown since its inception was -20.03%, smaller than the maximum NOSGX drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOBOX and NOSGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOBOXNOSGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.03%

-56.92%

+36.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-9.07%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.27%

-28.13%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.15%

-28.34%

+9.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.03%

-45.66%

+25.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.23%

-0.17%

-6.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.55%

-9.04%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

2.60%

-1.43%

Volatility

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Bond Index Fund (NOBOX) is 1.30%, while Northern Small Cap Value Fund (NOSGX) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that NOBOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOSGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOBOXNOSGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

4.98%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

12.07%

-8.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

18.07%

-13.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.10%

23.82%

-17.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.04%

24.58%

-19.54%

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NOBOX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NOSGX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NOBOX vs. NOSGX - Dividend Comparison

NOBOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than NOSGX's 37.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOBOX
Northern Bond Index Fund
3.75%2.88%3.46%2.63%1.53%2.10%3.12%3.18%2.80%2.77%2.45%2.61%
NOSGX
Northern Small Cap Value Fund
37.15%43.99%57.55%6.99%5.84%16.35%1.96%7.08%11.90%9.76%2.26%4.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


NOBOX and NOSGX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOSGX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to NOBOX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOBOX dropped -20.03% vs NOSGX's -56.92%.

NOSGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOBOX and NOSGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer