PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NOAH vs. JHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NOAH vs. JHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) and James Hardie Industries plc (JHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOAH achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than JHX's 18.12% return. Over the past 10 years, NOAH has underperformed JHX with an annualized return of -4.34%, while JHX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.58% annualized return.


NOAH

1D
1.08%
1M
2.90%
YTD
2.59%
6M
6.96%
1Y
-4.76%
3Y*
0.54%
5Y*
-21.34%
10Y*
-4.34%

JHX

1D
-1.45%
1M
18.06%
YTD
18.12%
6M
17.95%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
-1.94%
5Y*
-6.55%
10Y*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NOAH vs. JHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NOAH
Noah Holdings Limited
2.59%-5.58%6.83%-8.37%-49.49%-35.81%35.17%-18.35%-6.40%111.04%
JHX
James Hardie Industries plc
18.12%-32.65%-20.33%115.55%-55.39%41.66%51.02%71.63%-31.53%12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between NOAH and JHX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2010

0.23

The correlation between NOAH and JHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NOAH:

CN¥38.08

JHX:

$0.22

PE Ratio

NOAH:

1.83

JHX:

109.18

PS Ratio

NOAH:

0.37

JHX:

2.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

NOAH:

CN¥2.61B

JHX:

$4.40B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NOAH:

CN¥2.07B

JHX:

$1.58B

EBITDA (TTM)

NOAH:

CN¥683.80M

JHX:

$797.30M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NOAH vs. JHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOAH
NOAH Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NOAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NOAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOAH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JHX
JHX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
JHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOAH vs. JHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) and James Hardie Industries plc (JHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NOAHJHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.07

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.20

0.05

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.39

0.08

-0.47

NOAH vs. JHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOAH Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the JHX Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOAH and JHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NOAH vs. JHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOAH drawdown since its inception was -86.16%, which is greater than JHX's maximum drawdown of -75.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOAH and JHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NOAHJHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.16%

-75.86%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.43%

-43.73%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.80%

-60.26%

+15.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.13%

-60.26%

-20.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.16%

-60.26%

-25.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.26%

-41.64%

-36.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.97%

-18.30%

-30.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.39%

27.18%

-14.79%

Volatility

NOAH vs. JHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is 8.19%, while James Hardie Industries plc (JHX) has a volatility of 14.45%. This indicates that NOAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NOAHJHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.19%

14.45%

-6.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.26%

34.19%

-9.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.27%

56.72%

-24.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.18%

43.80%

+11.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.57%

40.57%

+10.00%

Dividends

NOAH vs. JHX - Dividend Comparison

NOAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%, while JHX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHX
James Hardie Industries plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.67%2.70%0.00%1.83%3.41%1.61%1.90%4.58%
NOAH
Noah Holdings Limited
11.23%11.53%18.15%2.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NOAH vs. JHX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Noah Holdings Limited and James Hardie Industries plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B1.10B1.20B1.30B20222023202420252026
625.75M
1.24B
(NOAH) Total Revenue
(JHX) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. NOAH values in CNY, JHX values in USD

NOAH vs. JHX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Noah Holdings Limited and James Hardie Industries plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
83.6%
36.2%
Portfolio components
NOAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 523.29M and revenue of 625.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.6%.

JHX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, James Hardie Industries plc reported a gross profit of 448.20M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.2%.

NOAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 236.44M and revenue of 625.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.8%.

JHX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, James Hardie Industries plc reported an operating income of 181.60M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.7%.

NOAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a net income of 124.72M and revenue of 625.75M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.

JHX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, James Hardie Industries plc reported a net income of 68.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NOAH and JHX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHX has higher volatility (14.45%) compared to NOAH (8.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOAH dropped -86.16% vs JHX's -75.86%.

JHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NOAH and JHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer