NOAH vs. INFU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU).

Performance

NOAH vs. INFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NOAH vs. INFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NOAH Noah Holdings Limited	-1.39%	-5.58%	6.83%	-8.37%	-49.49%	-35.81%	35.17%	-18.35%	-6.40%	111.04%
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc.	2.90%	6.15%	-19.83%	21.43%	-49.03%	-9.32%	120.16%	147.97%	49.57%	-9.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap NOAH : $139.38M INFU : $194.44M
EPS NOAH : $39.74 INFU : $0.45
PE Ratio NOAH : 0.25 INFU : 20.39
PS Ratio NOAH : 0.05 INFU : 1.36
PB Ratio NOAH : 0.01 INFU : 3.39
Total Revenue (TTM) NOAH : $2.60B INFU : $143.44M
Gross Profit (TTM) NOAH : $2.03B INFU : $80.30M
EBITDA (TTM) NOAH : $633.37M INFU : $21.96M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NOAH achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than INFU's 2.90% return. Over the past 10 years, NOAH has underperformed INFU with an annualized return of -5.30%, while INFU has yielded a comparatively higher 10.21% annualized return.

NOAH

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: -16.24%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 6M: -14.58%
• 1Y: 15.37%
• 3Y*: -5.14%
• 5Y*: -20.34%
• 10Y*: -5.30%

INFU

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: 5.25%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: -10.91%
• 1Y: 71.56%
• 3Y*: 6.00%
• 5Y*: -15.01%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NOAH vs. INFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NOAH

NOAH Risk / Return Rank: 51
NOAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NOAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NOAH Omega Ratio Rank: 50
NOAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
NOAH Martin Ratio Rank: 50

INFU

INFU Risk / Return Rank: 80
INFU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
INFU Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
INFU Omega Ratio Rank: 77
INFU Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
INFU Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NOAH vs. INFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NOAH	INFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.41	1.32	-0.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.84	2.25	-1.41
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.26	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	2.21	-1.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.79	5.43	-4.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NOAH vs. INFU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NOAH Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the INFU Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NOAH and INFU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NOAH	INFU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41	1.32	-0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37	-0.28	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.10	0.19	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.09	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between NOAH and INFU is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NOAH vs. INFU - Dividend Comparison

NOAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.69%, while INFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NOAH Noah Holdings Limited	11.69%	11.53%	18.15%	2.90%
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NOAH vs. INFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NOAH drawdown since its inception was -86.16%, which is greater than INFU's maximum drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOAH and INFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NOAH	INFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.16%	-79.49%	-6.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.43%	-31.17%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.13%	-79.49%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-86.16%	-79.49%	-6.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.11%	-59.73%	-19.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.56%	-41.83%	-6.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.48%	12.67%	-3.19%

Volatility

NOAH vs. INFU - Volatility Comparison

Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) has a higher volatility of 15.45% compared to InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) at 11.86%. This indicates that NOAH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INFU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NOAH	INFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.45%	11.86%	+3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.45%	34.52%	-9.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.35%	54.49%	-16.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.22%	52.98%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.90%	54.42%	-3.52%

Financials

NOAH vs. INFU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Noah Holdings Limited and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NOAH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 704.94M and revenue of 726.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.0%.

INFU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.44M and revenue of 36.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.4%.

NOAH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 251.54M and revenue of 726.84M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.6%.

INFU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 3.71M and revenue of 36.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

NOAH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a net income of 12.65M and revenue of 726.84M, resulting in a net margin of 1.7%.

INFU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 4.96M and revenue of 36.23M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.