NOAH vs. INFU
NOAH (Noah Holdings Limited) and INFU (InfuSystem Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. NOAH operates in Asset Management (Financial Services), while INFU operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, NOAH returned -5.10%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for INFU. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NOAH vs. INFU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NOAH achieves a 5.68% return, which is significantly higher than INFU's -1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, NOAH has underperformed INFU with an annualized return of -5.10%, while INFU has yielded a comparatively higher 11.84% annualized return.
NOAH
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.38%
- YTD
- 5.68%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- -2.29%
- 5Y*
- -19.27%
- 10Y*
- -5.10%
INFU
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -14.37%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- 1Y
- 56.34%
- 3Y*
- -0.89%
- 5Y*
- -13.62%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
NOAH vs. INFU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOAH Noah Holdings Limited | 5.68% | -5.58% | 6.83% | -8.37% | -49.49% | -35.81% | 35.17% | -18.35% | -6.40% | 111.04% |
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | -1.00% | 6.15% | -19.83% | 21.43% | -49.03% | -9.32% | 120.16% | 147.97% | 49.57% | -9.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between NOAH and INFU is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2010 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
NOAH:
$148.16M
INFU:
$185.54M
NOAH:
$38.08
INFU:
$0.38
NOAH:
0.28
INFU:
23.62
NOAH:
0.06
INFU:
1.31
NOAH:
0.02
INFU:
3.16
NOAH:
$2.61B
INFU:
$142.40M
NOAH:
$2.07B
INFU:
$80.81M
NOAH:
$683.80M
INFU:
$23.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NOAH vs. INFU — Risk / Return Rank
NOAH
INFU
NOAH vs. INFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) and InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NOAH | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 1.06 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.71 | 1.83 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.22 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | 1.72 | -1.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 4.04 | -2.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NOAH | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.06 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.35 | -0.26 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.22 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.08 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
NOAH vs. INFU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NOAH drawdown since its inception was -86.16%, which is greater than INFU's maximum drawdown of -79.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NOAH and INFU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NOAH | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.16% | -79.49% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.43% | -31.17% | +7.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.80% | -58.22% | +13.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -81.13% | -78.13% | -3.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.16% | -79.49% | -6.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.61% | -61.26% | -16.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.89% | -41.98% | -6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.70% | 13.28% | -1.58% |
Volatility
NOAH vs. INFU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Noah Holdings Limited (NOAH) is 7.60%, while InfuSystem Holdings Inc. (INFU) has a volatility of 19.55%. This indicates that NOAH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INFU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NOAH | INFU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.60% | 19.55% | -11.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.51% | 35.71% | -11.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.25% | 53.69% | -19.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.23% | 53.41% | +1.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.60% | 54.46% | -3.86% |
Dividends
NOAH vs. INFU - Dividend Comparison
NOAH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.91%, while INFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
INFU InfuSystem Holdings Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOAH Noah Holdings Limited | 10.91% | 11.53% | 18.15% | 2.90% |
Financials
NOAH vs. INFU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Noah Holdings Limited and InfuSystem Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NOAH vs. INFU - Profitability Comparison
NOAH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 523.29M and revenue of 625.75M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.6%.
INFU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 19.68M and revenue of 33.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.
NOAH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 236.44M and revenue of 625.75M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.8%.
INFU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.59M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
NOAH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Noah Holdings Limited reported a net income of 124.72M and revenue of 625.75M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.
INFU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InfuSystem Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.02M and revenue of 33.68M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NOAH and INFU have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INFU has higher volatility (19.55%) compared to NOAH (7.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NOAH dropped -86.16% vs INFU's -79.49%.
INFU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NOAH and INFU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer