NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO
NNRG.NEO (Ninepoint Energy ETF) and VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NNRG.NEO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index, while VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, NNRG.NEO returned 34.11%/yr vs 13.27%/yr for VGG.TO. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NNRG.NEO charges 1.79%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for VGG.TO.
Performance
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NNRG.NEO achieves a 47.23% return, which is significantly higher than VGG.TO's 9.09% return.
NNRG.NEO
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 47.23%
- 6M
- 39.75%
- 1Y
- 71.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.98%
- 5Y*
- 34.11%
- 10Y*
- —
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 7.09%
- 1Y
- 21.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.51%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.57%
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNRG.NEO Ninepoint Energy ETF | 47.23% | 19.14% | 13.26% | -4.21% | 66.18% | 55.91% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 9.09% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 17.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between NNRG.NEO and VGG.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021 | 0.12 |
The correlation between NNRG.NEO and VGG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
NNRG.NEO
VGG.TO
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
NNRG.NEO
VGG.TO
Basic Materials
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Communication Services
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Consumer Cyclical
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Consumer Defensive
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Financial Services
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Healthcare
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Industrials
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Real Estate
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
-
Technology
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Utilities
NNRG.NEO
-
VGG.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
NNRG.NEO
VGG.TO
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO) and Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NNRG.NEO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.60 | 3.05 | +3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.91 | 11.36 | +2.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NNRG.NEO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 2.11 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 1.06 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.98 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NNRG.NEO drawdown since its inception was -35.78%, which is greater than VGG.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNRG.NEO and VGG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NNRG.NEO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.78% | -24.58% | -11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -7.07% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.52% | -15.56% | -7.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.78% | -18.52% | -17.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.63% | 0.00% | -3.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.58% | -2.93% | -6.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 1.89% | +3.25% |
Volatility
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Ninepoint Energy ETF (NNRG.NEO) has a higher volatility of 10.30% compared to Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) at 2.50%. This indicates that NNRG.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NNRG.NEO | VGG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.30% | 2.50% | +7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.65% | 7.87% | +12.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.55% | 10.22% | +14.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.60% | 12.63% | +21.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.55% | 14.97% | +19.58% |
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NNRG.NEO has a 1.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VGG.TO's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
NNRG.NEO vs. VGG.TO - Dividend Comparison
NNRG.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than VGG.TO's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NNRG.NEO Ninepoint Energy ETF | 0.51% | 0.37% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 9.08% | 1.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NNRG.NEO and VGG.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.79% for NNRG.NEO.
NNRG.NEO is categorized as Energy Equities, while VGG.TO is Dividend. NNRG.NEO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index, while VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Ninepoint and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.79% for NNRG.NEO and 0.30% for VGG.TO.
Find the right allocation for NNRG.NEO and VGG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer