PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NNBR vs. ETN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NNBR vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NN, Inc. (NNBR) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NNBR achieves a 158.59% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's 31.12% return. Over the past 10 years, NNBR has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of -14.02%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 23.40% annualized return.


NNBR

1D
-0.90%
1M
-5.16%
6M
122.15%
YTD
158.59%
1Y
65.50%
3Y*
1.67%
5Y*
-13.51%
10Y*
-14.02%
ALL TIME*
-0.85%

ETN

1D
7.32%
1M
4.19%
6M
18.85%
YTD
31.12%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
25.38%
5Y*
23.26%
10Y*
23.40%
ALL TIME*
11.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04B$939.19M$1.06B
$5.38M$6.52M$10.58M

NNBR vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NNBR
NN, Inc.
158.59%-60.86%-18.25%166.67%-63.41%-37.60%-28.97%41.38%-75.21%46.53%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
31.12%-2.79%39.51%56.22%-7.18%46.70%29.88%42.76%-10.04%21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NNBR and ETN is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 1994

0.29

The correlation between NNBR and ETN shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NNBR:

$174.16M

ETN:

$161.22B

EPS

NNBR:

-$0.70

ETN:

$9.83

PS Ratio

NNBR:

0.38

ETN:

5.39

Total Revenue (TTM)

NNBR:

$434.97M

ETN:

$30.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NNBR:

$9.88M

ETN:

$10.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

NNBR:

$19.03M

ETN:

$6.06B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NNBR vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NNBR
NNBR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NNBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NNBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NNBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NNBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
NNBR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
ETN Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NNBR vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NN, Inc. (NNBR) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NNBRETNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.07

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

0.50

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.17

1.07

+1.11

NNBR vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NNBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NNBR and ETN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NNBR vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NNBR drawdown since its inception was -96.83%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NNBR and ETN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NNBRETNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.83%

-68.95%

-27.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.32%

-18.33%

-37.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.78%

-34.46%

-43.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.06%

-34.46%

-51.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.83%

-44.55%

-52.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.29%

-4.72%

-84.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.48%

-14.87%

-38.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.22%

8.63%

+23.59%

Volatility

NNBR vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

NN, Inc. (NNBR) has a higher volatility of 26.33% compared to Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) at 15.81%. This indicates that NNBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NNBRETNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.33%

15.81%

+10.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.68%

31.45%

+37.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.27%

37.69%

+46.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.34%

31.33%

+40.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.46%

30.53%

+43.93%

Dividends

NNBR vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

NNBR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.03%1.31%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%1.88%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%
NNBR
NN, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.27%4.17%1.01%1.47%1.76%

Financials

NNBR vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NN, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

NNBR vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NN, Inc. and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

NNBR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NN, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 118.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.86B and revenue of 8.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.5%.

NNBR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NN, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.06M and revenue of 118.45M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.9%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.39B and revenue of 8.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.

NNBR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NN, Inc. reported a net income of -7.61M and revenue of 118.45M, resulting in a net margin of -6.4%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 821.00M and revenue of 8.53B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NNBR and ETN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NNBR has higher volatility (26.33%) compared to ETN (15.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NNBR dropped -96.83% vs ETN's -68.95%.

NNBR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NNBR and ETN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer