NMZ vs. JQC
NMZ (Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund) and JQC (Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund) are both mutual funds - NMZ is a High Yield Muni fund actively managed by Nuveen, while JQC is a Bank Loan fund managed by Nuveen. Over the past 10 years, NMZ returned 2.41%/yr vs 5.73%/yr for JQC. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NMZ charges 1.50%/yr vs 4.34%/yr for JQC.
Performance
NMZ vs. JQC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMZ achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, NMZ has underperformed JQC with an annualized return of 2.41%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively higher 5.73% annualized return.
NMZ
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 3.55%
- YTD
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 8.24%
- 3Y*
- 6.17%
- 5Y*
- -2.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
JQC
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- -0.60%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -0.85%
- 3Y*
- 10.59%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
NMZ vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMZ Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | 5.99% | 1.56% | 16.52% | 0.69% | -27.36% | 10.41% | 7.33% | 28.36% | -9.47% | 12.87% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 1.77% | -0.36% | 22.29% | 15.26% | -14.22% | 13.29% | -2.96% | 21.78% | -4.33% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMZ and JQC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2003 | 0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMZ vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank
NMZ
JQC
NMZ vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NMZ | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | -0.08 | +1.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.87 | -0.16 | +4.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NMZ vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMZ drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMZ and JQC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMZ | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -75.18% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.94% | -10.15% | +4.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.72% | -15.37% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.82% | -19.83% | -19.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.03% | -47.99% | +7.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.99% | -4.36% | -5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.47% | -8.80% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 5.23% | -3.03% |
Volatility
NMZ vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund (NMZ) has a higher volatility of 2.50% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 1.77%. This indicates that NMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMZ | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 1.77% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 8.72% | -1.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.47% | 11.19% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 13.13% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 17.52% | -2.79% |
NMZ vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMZ has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
NMZ vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison
NMZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, less than JQC's 13.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 13.13% | 12.91% | 11.39% | 11.42% | 9.71% | 10.03% | 16.11% | 16.14% | 6.53% | 7.42% | 6.99% | 7.51% |
NMZ Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity Fund | 7.56% | 7.71% | 6.35% | 5.44% | 7.04% | 5.10% | 5.09% | 4.99% | 6.15% | 5.94% | 6.94% | 6.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NMZ and JQC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMZ has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to JQC (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMZ dropped -58.53% vs JQC's -75.18%.
NMZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NMZ and JQC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer