PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMTRX vs. FLAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTRX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than FLAAX's 1.21% return. Over the past 10 years, NMTRX has outperformed FLAAX with an annualized return of 2.36%, while FLAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.


NMTRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.88%
1Y
8.18%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
2.36%

FLAAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.21%
6M
1.57%
1Y
5.58%
3Y*
3.50%
5Y*
-0.77%
10Y*
1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.47%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
1.21%2.78%2.58%6.52%-16.29%3.89%5.64%9.03%0.50%8.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NMTRX and FLAAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.88

The correlation between NMTRX and FLAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMTRX vs. FLAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FLAAX
FLAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FLAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FLAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMTRXFLAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.71

1.51

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

1.94

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

5.68

+6.19

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the FLAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTRX and FLAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMTRXFLAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.08

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.17

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.39

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.92

+0.07

Drawdowns

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTRX drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum FLAAX drawdown of -21.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTRX and FLAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTRXFLAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-21.01%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-3.07%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-6.04%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-21.01%

+4.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

-21.01%

+4.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.23%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-2.74%

-0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.04%

-0.32%

Volatility

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) has a higher volatility of 1.25% compared to Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund (FLAAX) at 1.16%. This indicates that NMTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMTRXFLAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

1.16%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

2.17%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

2.86%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.03%

4.55%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.40%

4.66%

-0.26%

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTRX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FLAAX's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMTRX vs. FLAAX - Dividend Comparison

NMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than FLAAX's 3.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLAAX
Nuveen All-American Municipal Bond Fund
3.89%4.21%3.85%3.55%3.39%2.83%3.07%3.69%3.72%3.65%3.79%3.84%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.58%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMTRX and FLAAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (1.25%) compared to FLAAX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMTRX dropped -16.36% vs FLAAX's -21.01%.

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMTRX and FLAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer