PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMTRX vs. BSIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTRX achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly higher than BSIIX's 0.93% return. Over the past 10 years, NMTRX has underperformed BSIIX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while BSIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.60% annualized return.


NMTRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-2.16%
6M
0.55%
YTD
1.25%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
2.09%
ALL TIME*
3.95%

BSIIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.23%
6M
0.10%
YTD
0.93%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
6.32%
5Y*
2.73%
10Y*
3.60%
ALL TIME*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
1.25%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
0.93%8.59%5.22%6.18%-6.14%0.80%7.22%7.65%-0.42%4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between NMTRX and BSIIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2008

0.29

Over the past year, NMTRX and BSIIX have become more correlated (0.66) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMTRX vs. BSIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BSIIX
BSIIX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BSIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
BSIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMTRXBSIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.30

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

1.61

+0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

5.86

+3.31

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the BSIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTRX and BSIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTRX drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum BSIIX drawdown of -18.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTRX and BSIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTRXBSIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-18.76%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-2.84%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-2.84%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-9.13%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

-9.91%

-6.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-1.35%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-1.80%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

0.78%

-0.03%

Volatility

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) has a higher volatility of 0.92% compared to BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I (BSIIX) at 0.69%. This indicates that NMTRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMTRXBSIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

0.69%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

2.44%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

2.99%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.04%

3.03%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.40%

3.15%

+1.25%

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTRX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BSIIX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMTRX vs. BSIIX - Dividend Comparison

NMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than BSIIX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSIIX
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I
4.83%5.07%4.75%3.33%3.58%2.98%2.92%3.54%3.32%3.45%2.91%3.19%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.31%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMTRX and BSIIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NMTRX has higher volatility (0.92%) compared to BSIIX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMTRX dropped -16.36% vs BSIIX's -18.76%.

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMTRX and BSIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer