PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMTRX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMTRX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return. Over the past 10 years, NMTRX has underperformed ASFYX with an annualized return of 2.36%, while ASFYX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.97% annualized return.


NMTRX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.90%
YTD
2.47%
6M
2.88%
1Y
8.51%
3Y*
4.20%
5Y*
0.51%
10Y*
2.36%

ASFYX

1D
0.56%
1M
1.71%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.77%
1Y
26.49%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
3.02%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
2.47%3.90%1.99%6.21%-11.98%2.69%5.25%9.26%1.06%7.41%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%8.99%-12.59%6.78%

Correlation

The correlation between NMTRX and ASFYX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2010

0.01

The correlation between NMTRX and ASFYX shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (5 years) to 0.01 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMTRX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMTRX
NMTRX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
NMTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
NMTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMTRXASFYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.80

2.20

+0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.63

2.93

+1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.39

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

4.95

-1.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.71

17.88

-6.17

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMTRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMTRX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMTRXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

2.20

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.22

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.23

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.35

+0.65

Drawdowns

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMTRX drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, smaller than the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMTRX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMTRXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-36.43%

+20.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-5.24%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.77%

-30.32%

+24.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-36.43%

+20.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

-36.43%

+20.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.22%

+18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.91%

-13.18%

+10.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

1.45%

-0.73%

Volatility

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts (NMTRX) is 1.25%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that NMTRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMTRXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.25%

3.67%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.26%

9.54%

-7.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03%

11.77%

-8.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.03%

13.77%

-9.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.40%

12.71%

-8.31%

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMTRX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMTRX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

NMTRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
NMTRX
Nuveen Municipal Total Return Managed Accounts
4.58%4.46%3.55%3.67%3.28%2.73%2.92%3.20%3.47%3.28%3.71%3.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMTRX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to NMTRX (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMTRX dropped -16.36% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

NMTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMTRX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer