PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMPAX vs. VNVYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund (VNVYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NMPAX having a 14.46% return and VNVYX slightly higher at 14.52%. Over the past 10 years, NMPAX has underperformed VNVYX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while VNVYX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.


NMPAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.14%
6M
9.08%
YTD
14.46%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.37%
ALL TIME*
9.52%

VNVYX

1D
0.52%
1M
-3.87%
6M
6.29%
YTD
14.52%
1Y
20.49%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
10.92%
ALL TIME*
11.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
14.46%7.23%13.67%16.32%-13.27%24.66%8.71%25.99%-11.44%15.84%
VNVYX
Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund
14.52%12.17%19.45%16.53%-10.59%21.82%10.92%30.53%-15.98%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NMPAX and VNVYX is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2008

0.92

Over the past year, the correlation between NMPAX and VNVYX has dropped to 0.69 - well below their long-term average of 0.92, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMPAX vs. VNVYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NMPAX
NMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VNVYX
VNVYX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VNVYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VNVYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VNVYX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VNVYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VNVYX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund (VNVYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMPAXVNVYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.20

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.98

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

6.20

+2.37

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the VNVYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMPAX and VNVYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMPAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than VNVYX's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMPAX and VNVYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMPAXVNVYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.31%

-42.81%

-11.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-12.19%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-22.60%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-22.60%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-42.81%

+0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-8.58%

+6.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-6.22%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

3.63%

-1.20%

Volatility

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) is 3.40%, while Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund (VNVYX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that NMPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNVYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMPAXVNVYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

5.87%

-2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

16.60%

-4.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

21.80%

-6.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

19.44%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

20.77%

+0.30%

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMPAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than VNVYX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMPAX vs. VNVYX - Dividend Comparison

NMPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, less than VNVYX's 39.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
10.45%9.34%11.35%7.97%11.65%18.03%5.96%5.70%10.06%7.66%7.97%10.12%
VNVYX
Natixis Funds Trust II Vaughan Nelson Mid Cap Fund
39.09%45.02%11.91%0.53%3.46%16.14%12.25%1.07%9.78%2.71%3.33%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMPAX and VNVYX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VNVYX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to NMPAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMPAX dropped -54.31% vs VNVYX's -42.81%.

NMPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMPAX and VNVYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer