PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMPAX vs. BTMFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMPAX achieves a 14.46% return, which is significantly higher than BTMFX's 7.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with NMPAX having a 10.37% annualized return and BTMFX not far ahead at 10.61%.


NMPAX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.14%
6M
9.08%
YTD
14.46%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
10.37%
ALL TIME*
9.52%

BTMFX

1D
0.08%
1M
2.15%
6M
4.87%
YTD
7.93%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
8.64%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
14.46%7.23%13.67%16.32%-13.27%24.66%8.71%25.99%-11.44%15.84%
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
7.93%4.29%10.27%13.06%-10.91%24.77%9.72%33.00%-3.36%20.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NMPAX and BTMFX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.94

The correlation between NMPAX and BTMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.94 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMPAX vs. BTMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NMPAX
NMPAX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
NMPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
NMPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

BTMFX
BTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
BTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
BTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NMPAXBTMFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.15

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.24

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

3.43

+5.14

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMPAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the BTMFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMPAX and BTMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMPAX drawdown since its inception was -54.31%, which is greater than BTMFX's maximum drawdown of -49.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMPAX and BTMFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMPAXBTMFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.31%

-49.26%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-7.79%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-17.77%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-20.79%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-37.14%

-4.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-0.68%

-1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-6.12%

-1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

2.80%

-0.37%

Volatility

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund (NMPAX) and Boston Trust Midcap Fund (BTMFX) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMPAXBTMFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

3.47%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.64%

8.19%

+3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

11.72%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

15.74%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.07%

17.38%

+3.69%

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMPAX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BTMFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMPAX vs. BTMFX - Dividend Comparison

NMPAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.45%, more than BTMFX's 10.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTMFX
Boston Trust Midcap Fund
10.06%10.86%4.23%4.41%4.71%4.91%1.98%6.95%5.96%6.61%7.03%6.60%
NMPAX
Columbia Mid Cap Index Fund
10.45%9.34%11.35%7.97%11.65%18.03%5.96%5.70%10.06%7.66%7.97%10.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMPAX and BTMFX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTMFX has higher volatility (3.47%) compared to NMPAX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMPAX dropped -54.31% vs BTMFX's -49.26%.

NMPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMPAX and BTMFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer