NMMEX vs. FCEEX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NMMEX (Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund) and FCEEX (Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds. Over the past 5 years, NMMEX returned 9.44%/yr vs 10.78%/yr for FCEEX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NMMEX charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FCEEX.

Performance

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMMEX achieves a 32.91% return, which is significantly higher than FCEEX's 30.48% return.

NMMEX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 6.28%
• YTD: 32.91%
• 6M: 34.01%
• 1Y: 60.83%
• 3Y*: 26.39%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: 11.02%

FCEEX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 7.20%
• YTD: 30.48%
• 6M: 31.78%
• 1Y: 55.11%
• 3Y*: 27.49%
• 5Y*: 10.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NMMEX Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund	32.91%	34.16%	6.63%	12.12%	-22.33%	-1.22%	18.85%	10.18%
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	30.48%	34.81%	10.51%	12.52%	-16.96%	-1.29%	10.19%	9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NMMEX and FCEEX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019	0.90

The correlation between NMMEX and FCEEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NMMEX vs. FCEEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMMEX

NMMEX Risk / Return Rank: 90
NMMEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
NMMEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
NMMEX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
NMMEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
NMMEX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FCEEX

FCEEX Risk / Return Rank: 87
FCEEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FCEEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FCEEX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FCEEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FCEEX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX) and Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NMMEX	FCEEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.19	2.82	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	3.49	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.53	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	4.32	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.44	16.33	+0.11

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMMEX Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is comparable to the FCEEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMMEX and FCEEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMMEX drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than FCEEX's maximum drawdown of -34.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMMEX and FCEEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NMMEX	FCEEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.64%	-34.68%	-9.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.25%	-12.98%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.13%	-15.47%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.64%	-33.39%	-11.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.23%	-0.23%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.98%	-11.19%	-3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.72%	3.42%	+0.30%

Volatility

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund (NMMEX) is 9.13%, while Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor (FCEEX) has a volatility of 10.40%. This indicates that NMMEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCEEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NMMEX	FCEEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.13%	10.40%	-1.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.55%	17.56%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.39%	19.92%	-0.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.90%	17.41%	+6.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.61%	18.63%	+2.98%

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMMEX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FCEEX's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

NMMEX vs. FCEEX - Dividend Comparison

NMMEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than FCEEX's 2.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCEEX Franklin Emerging Market Core Equity (IU) Fund Advisor	2.26%	3.29%	4.17%	4.36%	4.08%	3.38%	2.98%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NMMEX Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity Fund	1.45%	1.93%	0.80%	1.82%	0.89%	29.82%	6.99%	8.34%	0.99%	0.00%	1.90%	4.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NMMEX and FCEEX in my portfolio?

NMMEX and FCEEX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NMMEX or FCEEX?

FCEEX has higher volatility (10.40%) compared to NMMEX (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMMEX dropped -44.64% vs FCEEX's -34.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NMMEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.