PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMIEX vs. FISZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMIEX achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly lower than FISZX's 27.01% return.


NMIEX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.23%
YTD
10.60%
6M
13.43%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*
10.39%

FISZX

1D
0.37%
1M
11.60%
YTD
27.01%
6M
32.57%
1Y
42.44%
3Y*
22.28%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NMIEX
Northern Active M International Equity Fund
10.60%34.98%4.43%20.82%-17.17%14.41%11.70%9.95%
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
27.01%31.77%3.61%15.83%-28.32%9.91%23.49%13.42%

Correlation

The correlation between NMIEX and FISZX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.86

The correlation between NMIEX and FISZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMIEX vs. FISZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMIEX
NMIEX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
NMIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NMIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FISZX
FISZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FISZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FISZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FISZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FISZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FISZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) and Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMIEXFISZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

2.89

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.62

11.38

-3.75

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FISZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMIEX and FISZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMIEXFISZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.21

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.50

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.65

-0.35

Drawdowns

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMIEX drawdown since its inception was -55.92%, which is greater than FISZX's maximum drawdown of -39.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMIEX and FISZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMIEXFISZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.92%

-39.92%

-16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.08%

-14.48%

+2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.58%

-14.63%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.54%

-39.92%

+8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-12.37%

-0.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

3.66%

-0.51%

Volatility

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Active M International Equity Fund (NMIEX) is 4.59%, while Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund (FISZX) has a volatility of 7.78%. This indicates that NMIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMIEXFISZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

7.78%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.68%

16.22%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

18.93%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

17.84%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.95%

18.27%

-1.32%

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMIEX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FISZX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMIEX vs. FISZX - Dividend Comparison

NMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.44%, more than FISZX's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FISZX
Fidelity SAI International SMA Completion Fund
1.52%1.92%2.55%1.89%1.37%6.08%0.90%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NMIEX
Northern Active M International Equity Fund
9.44%10.43%14.92%6.95%1.53%10.42%0.80%5.83%6.65%1.34%1.73%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMIEX and FISZX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FISZX has higher volatility (7.78%) compared to NMIEX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMIEX dropped -55.92% vs FISZX's -39.92%.

FISZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMIEX and FISZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer