PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMHIX vs. GHYIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) and Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMHIX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than GHYIX's 2.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NMHIX has underperformed GHYIX with an annualized return of 2.27%, while GHYIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.70% annualized return.


NMHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
0.48%
6M
0.81%
1Y
5.94%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
2.27%

GHYIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.05%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.80%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
0.89%
10Y*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
0.48%3.56%6.27%4.34%-14.26%4.90%4.04%8.28%2.19%8.75%
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
2.39%3.92%5.74%7.34%-14.79%5.79%4.96%11.47%4.97%9.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NMHIX and GHYIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2016

0.82

The correlation between NMHIX and GHYIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMHIX vs. GHYIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMHIX
NMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
NMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GHYIX
GHYIX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GHYIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GHYIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GHYIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GHYIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
GHYIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) and Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMHIXGHYIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.49

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

7.74

+0.48

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the GHYIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMHIX and GHYIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMHIXGHYIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.15

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.17

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.69

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.00

-0.45

Drawdowns

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMHIX drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum GHYIX drawdown of -35.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMHIX and GHYIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMHIXGHYIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-35.88%

+16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.62%

-3.05%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.29%

-8.35%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.38%

-19.82%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.38%

-19.82%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.64%

0.00%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-4.61%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.98%

-0.28%

Volatility

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund (NMHIX) is 1.10%, while Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class (GHYIX) has a volatility of 1.29%. This indicates that NMHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GHYIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMHIXGHYIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.10%

1.29%

-0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

2.48%

-0.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

3.53%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.62%

5.35%

-0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.72%

5.39%

-0.67%

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMHIX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than GHYIX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

NMHIX vs. GHYIX - Dividend Comparison

NMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, less than GHYIX's 4.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GHYIX
Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Institutional Class
4.64%6.12%4.38%3.56%3.04%3.06%3.44%4.03%4.12%4.36%4.81%4.88%
NMHIX
Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund
4.16%3.98%3.81%3.11%2.43%2.74%2.90%3.36%3.64%3.44%4.42%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMHIX and GHYIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GHYIX has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to NMHIX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMHIX dropped -19.38% vs GHYIX's -35.88%.

GHYIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMHIX and GHYIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer