PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMCO vs. QQQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

NMCO vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund (NMCO) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

NMCO vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NMCO
Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund
6.43%4.18%13.64%-4.19%-25.66%26.98%-11.55%2.16%
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
-0.51%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%8.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMCO achieves a 6.43% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's -0.51% return.


NMCO

1D
0.95%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
6.43%
6M
1.82%
1Y
7.40%
3Y*
4.68%
5Y*
0.59%
10Y*

QQQX

1D
4.05%
1M
1.77%
YTD
-0.51%
6M
4.98%
1Y
26.55%
3Y*
13.53%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
11.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NMCO vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NMCO has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

NMCO vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMCO
NMCO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
NMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMCO vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund (NMCO) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMCOQQQXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.26

-0.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.95

1.87

-0.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.10

-1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.43

10.38

-7.96

NMCO vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMCO and QQQX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMCOQQQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.26

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.41

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.46

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between NMCO and QQQX is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

NMCO vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

NMCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, less than QQQX's 8.27% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NMCO
Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund
7.70%8.04%6.79%5.96%6.65%4.75%5.57%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQX
Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
8.27%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%

Drawdowns

NMCO vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMCO drawdown since its inception was -42.03%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMCO and QQQX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


NMCOQQQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.03%

-57.25%

+15.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.68%

-12.93%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.82%

-29.33%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.48%

-0.86%

-10.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-8.09%

-8.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

2.61%

+0.65%

Volatility

NMCO vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Municipal Credit Opportunities Fund (NMCO) is 3.52%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that NMCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


NMCOQQQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

8.15%

-4.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.63%

11.99%

-5.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.15%

21.13%

-9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.08%

19.80%

-5.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

21.05%

-1.34%