PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NMCIX vs. CGIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya MidCap Opportunities Fund (NMCIX) and American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMCIX achieves a 8.10% return, which is significantly lower than CGIAX's 13.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NMCIX has outperformed CGIAX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while CGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.


NMCIX

1D
0.40%
1M
8.29%
YTD
8.10%
6M
5.86%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
13.01%
5Y*
5.49%
10Y*
11.73%

CGIAX

1D
0.58%
1M
4.83%
YTD
13.39%
6M
16.05%
1Y
30.26%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NMCIX
Voya MidCap Opportunities Fund
8.10%3.45%15.64%23.34%-25.31%11.38%40.69%37.57%-7.98%24.98%
CGIAX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund
13.39%35.04%3.26%15.22%-15.49%9.79%7.73%27.06%-14.45%26.00%

Correlation

The correlation between NMCIX and CGIAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2008

0.71

The correlation between NMCIX and CGIAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NMCIX vs. CGIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMCIX
NMCIX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NMCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NMCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NMCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NMCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
NMCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

CGIAX
CGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
CGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya MidCap Opportunities Fund (NMCIX) and American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NMCIXCGIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.43

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.59

2.74

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

10.34

-8.61

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NMCIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the CGIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMCIX and CGIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NMCIXCGIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.28

-1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.59

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.60

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.47

-0.05

Drawdowns

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMCIX drawdown since its inception was -68.41%, which is greater than CGIAX's maximum drawdown of -35.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMCIX and CGIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NMCIXCGIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.41%

-35.78%

-32.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.38%

-10.90%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.22%

-12.58%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.00%

-30.60%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.00%

-35.78%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.90%

-7.94%

-12.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

2.89%

+2.75%

Volatility

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya MidCap Opportunities Fund (NMCIX) is 4.12%, while American Funds International Growth and Income Fund (CGIAX) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that NMCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NMCIXCGIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

4.79%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.28%

11.05%

+3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.46%

13.13%

+5.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.95%

14.61%

+8.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

15.91%

+6.15%

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NMCIX and CGIAX have an expense ratio of 0.93%.


Dividends

NMCIX vs. CGIAX - Dividend Comparison

NMCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.91%, more than CGIAX's 7.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGIAX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund
7.27%8.13%3.34%2.27%3.99%6.90%1.35%2.36%2.74%1.80%2.29%3.17%
NMCIX
Voya MidCap Opportunities Fund
12.91%13.96%10.01%0.72%0.00%21.64%17.74%12.19%19.82%13.64%6.06%8.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


NMCIX and CGIAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGIAX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to NMCIX (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMCIX dropped -68.41% vs CGIAX's -35.78%.

CGIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NMCIX and CGIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer