NMAVX vs. FLCGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX).
NMAVX is managed by Nuance Investments. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013. FLCGX is managed by Meeder Funds. It was launched on Mar 20, 1985.
Performance
NMAVX vs. FLCGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NMAVX vs. FLCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.01% | 1.91% | 5.20% | 6.44% | -5.26% | 11.10% | 4.41% | 30.71% | -5.44% | 14.81% |
FLCGX Meeder Quantex Fund | -3.60% | 19.10% | 36.38% | 14.81% | -13.77% | 27.27% | -5.36% | 18.48% | -12.35% | 13.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMAVX achieves a 2.01% return, which is significantly higher than FLCGX's -3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, NMAVX has underperformed FLCGX with an annualized return of 7.67%, while FLCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.79% annualized return.
NMAVX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- 1Y
- 10.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 7.67%
FLCGX
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.18%
- YTD
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -1.55%
- 1Y
- 17.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NMAVX vs. FLCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NMAVX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCGX's 1.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NMAVX vs. FLCGX — Risk / Return Rank
NMAVX
FLCGX
NMAVX vs. FLCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) and Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NMAVX | FLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 1.04 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.57 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.23 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.55 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 7.23 | -3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NMAVX | FLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 1.04 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.47 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.36 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between NMAVX and FLCGX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NMAVX vs. FLCGX - Dividend Comparison
NMAVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than FLCGX's 8.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.98% | 1.00% | 7.55% | 1.78% | 9.05% | 11.98% | 0.61% | 5.91% | 7.16% | 7.05% | 1.83% | 4.24% |
FLCGX Meeder Quantex Fund | 8.75% | 8.48% | 39.58% | 1.17% | 2.73% | 16.70% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 2.92% | 2.00% | 17.06% |
Drawdowns
NMAVX vs. FLCGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMAVX drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, smaller than the maximum FLCGX drawdown of -66.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMAVX and FLCGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMAVX | FLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -66.94% | +36.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.80% | -11.76% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.40% | -32.83% | +14.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.93% | -50.45% | +19.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.84% | -6.25% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -12.93% | +9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.52% | +0.63% |
Volatility
NMAVX vs. FLCGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) is 3.80%, while Meeder Quantex Fund (FLCGX) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that NMAVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NMAVX | FLCGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 5.71% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.63% | 9.78% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.28% | 17.47% | -3.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.21% | 22.45% | -9.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.05% | 23.53% | -8.48% |