NLSI vs. RSEE
NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) and RSEE (Rareview Systematic Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NLSI charges 2.89%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for RSEE.
Performance
NLSI vs. RSEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSI achieves a 7.01% return, which is significantly lower than RSEE's 15.92% return.
NLSI
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 10.92%
- YTD
- 7.01%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSEE
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 15.92%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLSI vs. RSEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 7.01% | 1.90% |
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | 15.92% | -0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSI and RSEE is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSI vs. RSEE — Risk / Return Rank
NLSI
RSEE
NLSI vs. RSEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and Rareview Systematic Equity ETF (RSEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NLSI | RSEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.76 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
NLSI vs. RSEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum RSEE drawdown of -21.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and RSEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSI | RSEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -21.60% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.97% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.10% | -3.78% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.10% | — |
Volatility
NLSI vs. RSEE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLSI | RSEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.37% | 17.56% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 19.00% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 19.00% | +0.37% |
NLSI vs. RSEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than RSEE's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLSI vs. RSEE - Dividend Comparison
NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than RSEE's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.42% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RSEE Rareview Systematic Equity ETF | 0.21% | 0.24% | 9.02% | 0.84% | 1.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLSI and RSEE have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RSEE is cheaper at 1.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RSEE is cheaper with a 1.27% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.21% for RSEE.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Rareview Funds. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 1.27% for RSEE.
Find the right allocation for NLSI and RSEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer