PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NLSI vs. IVRA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NLSI vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NLSI

1D
0.44%
1M
4.20%
6M
9.70%
YTD
5.21%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IVRA

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NLSI vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NLSI
Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF
5.21%2.51%
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
11.70%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between NLSI and IVRA is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NLSI vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NLSI vs. IVRA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NLSI vs. IVRA - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NLSIIVRADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.79%

Volatility

NLSI vs. IVRA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NLSIIVRADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

NLSI vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison

NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than IVRA's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

NLSI vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison

NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while IVRA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
IVRA
Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF
16.80%5.68%3.71%2.47%2.30%3.01%
NLSI
Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF
2.90%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NLSI and IVRA have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IVRA is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IVRA is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.

IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.80%, compared with 2.90% for NLSI.

NLSI is categorized as Long-Short, while IVRA is ESG. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 0.59% for IVRA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NLSI and IVRA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer