NLSI vs. HDEF
NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) and HDEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NLSI is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Neos, while HDEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index. NLSI is actively managed, while HDEF is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. NLSI charges 2.89%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for HDEF.
Performance
NLSI vs. HDEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSI achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than HDEF's 9.88% return.
NLSI
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDEF
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 9.67%
- YTD
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.85%
NLSI vs. HDEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 5.21% | 2.51% |
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 9.88% | 2.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSI and HDEF is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSI vs. HDEF — Risk / Return Rank
NLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HDEF
NLSI vs. HDEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLSI | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.48 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLSI vs. HDEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum HDEF drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and HDEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSI | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -36.43% | +22.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -0.35% | -2.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -5.04% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility
NLSI vs. HDEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLSI | HDEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.62% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 11.78% | +7.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 14.15% | +5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 16.11% | +3.25% |
NLSI vs. HDEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than HDEF's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLSI vs. HDEF - Dividend Comparison
NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than HDEF's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 3.78% | 3.88% | 4.53% | 4.38% | 5.41% | 4.76% | 3.93% | 4.20% | 3.55% | 3.38% | 9.53% | 1.87% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.90% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLSI and HDEF have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 2.90% for NLSI.
NLSI is categorized as Long-Short, while HDEF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 0.20% for HDEF.
Find the right allocation for NLSI and HDEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer