NLSI vs. EMLP
NLSI (Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NLSI is a Long-Short fund actively managed by Neos, while EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. NLSI charges 2.89%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
NLSI vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NLSI achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly lower than EMLP's 18.66% return.
NLSI
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- YTD
- 18.66%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 21.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
NLSI vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 5.21% | 2.51% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 18.66% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between NLSI and EMLP is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NLSI vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
NLSI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EMLP
NLSI vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF (NLSI) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NLSI | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NLSI vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NLSI drawdown since its inception was -13.82%, smaller than the maximum EMLP drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NLSI and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NLSI | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.82% | -43.61% | +29.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -0.23% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -5.73% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility
NLSI vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NLSI | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.36% | 10.33% | +9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 14.54% | +4.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.36% | 17.68% | +1.68% |
NLSI vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NLSI has a 2.89% expense ratio, which is higher than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
NLSI vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
NLSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than EMLP's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.74% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
NLSI Neos Long/Short Equity Income ETF | 2.90% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NLSI and EMLP have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EMLP is cheaper at 0.96% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EMLP is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 2.89% for NLSI.
NLSI has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.74% for EMLP.
NLSI is categorized as Long-Short, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Neos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 2.89% for NLSI and 0.96% for EMLP.
Find the right allocation for NLSI and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer